Sorry. While the BRAWM response is informative, it does not "debunk" this article at. There is no question that the USA has been and continues to be impacted by fallout from Fukushima.
From February 20:
Lastly, the jet stream definitely affected the concentrations that we measured here, just as one can more easily smell perfume if one is downwind. However, after the major releases were done occurring in late March, the jet stream had less and less of an effect. Presently, any releases from the reactors are so small that not even the jet stream would bring any appreciable amount over the ocean.
Anonymous...your posts appear here very consistently (easily identified by your fondness for bolding - because bolding is apparently the new capslock for internet yelling)...
I'd like to remind you of the following because whatever points you're trying to make are entirely lost in the midst of the abusive language you use towards those of differing opinions.
The Forum Ettiquette post from Mark states the following:
All are welcome here on this forum. I just want to remind people of some general guidelines to keep the forum welcoming, appropriate, and organized:
Please DO NOT:
Call other people names
Use obscene language (your post will be blocked or deleted)
Post the exact same content multiple times (this may also get blocked anyway)
Please DO:
Be polite, civil, and respectful of different views
Provide links and references for facts you are using in your arguments
Stay on the topic of the thread, or start a new thread if your comment is off-topic
Thanks, Mark [BRAWM Team Member]
I would like to know why these terms are not being enforced against this poster - who continues to use obscenities like g**d*** and frequently uses name calling and other abusive tactics in an attempt to silence or discredit people who hold differing opinions.
Evidently the above poster doesn't realize that when spelled with a
lowercase "g", the emboldened adjective above is not an obscenity, but a perfectly good word that is found in the dictionary:
It's been my experience that the typical anti-nuke is not only manifestly ignorant of science, and dismally lacking in logic and reasoning skills; they also have a paltry and limited vocabulary.
Their arguments don't appear to be original, but merely parroted from one of many anti-nuke websites. Thus when their lies are challenged, they are incapable of offering a cogent counter-argument; but can only whine and complain that they are being bullied.
Such delicate and fragile creatures these anti-nukes be.
DEBUNKED!!
http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/forum/218/one-more-ocd-question.2012-04-17#c...
NOT Debunked
Sorry. While the BRAWM response is informative, it does not "debunk" this article at. There is no question that the USA has been and continues to be impacted by fallout from Fukushima.
WRONG!!
BRAWM team has said that the above is a goddam LIE
http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/6201#comment-23936
From February 20:
Lastly, the jet stream definitely affected the concentrations that we measured here, just as one can more easily smell perfume if one is downwind. However, after the major releases were done occurring in late March, the jet stream had less and less of an effect. Presently, any releases from the reactors are so small that not even the jet stream would bring any appreciable amount over the ocean.
Anonymous...your posts appear
Anonymous...your posts appear here very consistently (easily identified by your fondness for bolding - because bolding is apparently the new capslock for internet yelling)...
I'd like to remind you of the following because whatever points you're trying to make are entirely lost in the midst of the abusive language you use towards those of differing opinions.
The Forum Ettiquette post from Mark states the following:
All are welcome here on this forum. I just want to remind people of some general guidelines to keep the forum welcoming, appropriate, and organized:
Please DO NOT:
Call other people names
Use obscene language (your post will be blocked or deleted)
Post the exact same content multiple times (this may also get blocked anyway)
Please DO:
Be polite, civil, and respectful of different views
Provide links and references for facts you are using in your arguments
Stay on the topic of the thread, or start a new thread if your comment is off-topic
Thanks, Mark [BRAWM Team Member]
I would like to know why these terms are not being enforced against this poster - who continues to use obscenities like g**d*** and frequently uses name calling and other abusive tactics in an attempt to silence or discredit people who hold differing opinions.
Evidently....
Evidently the above poster doesn't realize that when spelled with a
lowercase "g", the emboldened adjective above is not an obscenity, but a perfectly good word that is found in the dictionary:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/goddamned
It's been my experience that the typical anti-nuke is not only manifestly ignorant of science, and dismally lacking in logic and reasoning skills; they also have a paltry and limited vocabulary.
Their arguments don't appear to be original, but merely parroted from one of many anti-nuke websites. Thus when their lies are challenged, they are incapable of offering a cogent counter-argument; but can only whine and complain that they are being bullied.
Such delicate and fragile creatures these anti-nukes be.
A verified Fukushima lie
I generally disregard the bold typing, obviously nuclear invested posters here. They lurk in all media outlets and forums related to Fukushima.
Unfortunately, I believe that the admission today of verified Fukushima deceit is just the tip of the iceberg:
http://mainichi.jp/english/english/newsselect/news/20120426p2a00m0na0070...
I expect a wave of "Oops, we forgot to report on this..." type media releases in the coming year as the CYA campaign begins in earnest.
Ah, nothing like some light
Ah, nothing like some light reading material with my oatmeal and green tea on a Tuesday morning.................