Fukushima Sabotage - Japanese Journalist Accuses Israel
In retaliation for Japan’s support of an independent Palestinian state
Source: American Free Press … by Richard Walker October 24, 2011
edited by Jim W. Dean
A Natural or Man Made Disaster ?
A leading Japanese journalist recently made two incredible claims about the Fukushima power plant that suffered a nuclear meltdown in March 2011, sending shockwaves around the world.
First, the former editor of a national newspaper in Japan says the U.S. and Israel knew Fukushima had weapons-grade uranium and plutonium that were exposed to the atmosphere after a massive tsunami wave hit the reactor.
Second, he contends that Israeli intelligence sabotaged the reactor in retaliation for Japan’s support of an independent Palestinian state.
According to Yoishi Shimatsu, a former editor of Japan Times Weekly, these nuclear materials were shipped to the plant in 2007 on the orders of Dick Cheney and George W. Bush, with the connivance of Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert.
The shipment was in the form of warhead cores secretly removed from the U.S. nuclear warheads facility BWXT Plantex near Amarillo, Texas.
While acting as the middleman, Israel transported warheads from the port of Houston, and in the process kept the best ones while giving the Japanese older warhead cores that had to be further enriched at Fukushima.
Shimatsu credits retired CIA agent and mercenary Roland Vincent Carnaby with learning the warheads were being transported from Houston.
In a strange twist, Carnaby was mysteriously shot dead less than a year later by Houston police at a traffic stop.
He was shot once in the back and once in the chest. He did not have a weapon in his hands.
Intelligence sources said he had been tracking a Mossad unit that was smuggling U.S. plutonium out of Houston docks for an Israeli nuclear reactor.
In an even more explosive charge, the journalist says that 20 minutes before the Fukushima plant’s nuclear meltdown, Israel was so upset with Japanese support for a Palestinian declaration of statehood that it double-crossed Japan by unleashing the Stuxnet virus on the plant’s computers.


Really?
Did Israel fuel FDU-3 with a hot load of MOX fuel?
Sorry, if memory serves, the MOX was from Areva. Made in USA.
Oh and the GE Mark-1 architecture is the most dangerous design in human history. The Spent Fuel Pool is located slightly lateral and vertical to the Explosion Prone nuclear reactor. This places TONS of very hot nuclear waste in the blast zone.
Credit goes to the 'Great Satan' not the 'Little Satan'.
The haters need to keep the program straight.
TTFN
Yes, I'm sure the crew of
Yes, I'm sure the crew of the U.S.S. Liberty in 1967 would also chuckle at this, as will those Muslims blamed for the Lavon Affair/Operation Susannah, in 1954.
I see so much debate about who is right in these pages, but it is curious that no one ever wants the TRUTH as documented by international human rights groups and other neutral witnesses, and documented during various CIA and Mossad hearings held in the 1970s by this nation's Congress and in Israel.
So you can go back to sleep....
diversion
The best way to cover your tracks is to obscure them with a confusion of tracks including some that seem more valid, real.
This looks like a classic case of someone feeling the need to trash facts by stirring excrement into them. No matter how compelling some part of the story might be it becomes repulsive. Throw in some true but misplaced data and anything that relates to it becomes an anathema.
Fukushima Sabotage
Here is a link to another website that has good informaition about HAARP and a connection to Fukushima :
http://www.naturalnews.com/032670_Fukushima_HAARP.html
Pure GARBAGE
First, the former editor of a national newspaper in Japan says the U.S. and Israel knew Fukushima had weapons-grade uranium and plutonium
The is complete BS. The uranium in Fukushima is not "weapon-grade". It is 3%-4% enriched uranium which is what BWRs are designed for. The plutonium in Unit 3 was MOX; about 7% Pu-239; and again NOT "weapon-grade"
...while giving the Japanese older warhead cores that had to be further enriched at Fukushima.
More gobbledy gook. Fukushima can't enrich uranium. There are no centrifuges or gaseous diffusion units at Fukushima, only reactors. Besides weapons use uranium that is more highly enriched than what reactors use; so there wouldn't even be a need to enrich.
While back
Some time ago, maybe a year or so ...
There WAS a link, on this blog, to a statement made by the scientific consultant to AREVA. The statement made soon after 311, was that the FDU-3 MOX load was MUCH hotter than standard. If memory serves, the number was on the order of 30% MOX and 70% UOX.
The purities were probably not on the typical weapon grade levels in FDU-3. The FDU-3 fuel load, WAS sufficient to produce a TOTALLY different explosion than the deflagrations seen in FDU-1, FDU-2 and/or TMI-PA-USA. The FDU-3 blast was a SUPERSONIC detonation, and Plutonium Fuel was scattered for about 30 miles, including Rocket Fuel. The structural members of the FDU-3 ventilation system showed fatal radiation emissions, which appear to be neutron induced.
Lots of such evidence points to a low-grade atomic blast in FDU-3. Some have called it a partially moderated prompt criticality.
Japan/USA/France -- crummy designs, greed, stupidity and callous disregard for human life caused the Fukushima Disaster.
No other party was involved.
IMHO
IDOIT CHOWDERHEAD!!!
The forum's resident IDIOT states:
Lots of such evidence points to a low-grade atomic blast in FDU-3.
The IDIOT doesn't understand the difference between "chemical" composition, and "isotopic" composition.
Even IF the FDU-3 was "hot"; a 30% MOX and 70% UO2 load; that still doesn't make it "bomb fuel".
It may be "hot" from the chemical composition standpoint; but it doesn't have the right "isotopic" mix for bomb fuel. True "weapons grade" bomb fuel has to have a high proportion of the fissile isotope Pu-239. "Reactor grade" MOX doesn't have the high proportion of Pu-239 that characterizes bomb fuel. Reactor grade MOX has too much Pu-240 and Pu-242 to be "weapons grade".
In order to get the high percentage of Pu-239 necessary for bomb fuel, one would have to use an isotopic enrichment process like the one used to enrich uranium using either gaseous diffusion or centrifuges. The reprocessing plants in Japan don't have those facilities.
So even if they mixed the MOX with Uranium Dioxide in a higher percentage than the nominal 7%; there's no way this mixing process can cause the higher percentage of Pu-239 necessary for bomb fuel.
The forum's resident IDIOT CHOWDERHEAD has not been able to comprehend all the evidence presented here that the FDU-3 explosion was NOT a nuclear explosion.
The US nuclear weapons labs of Los Alamos and Lawrence Livermore; the USA's true experts in nuclear explosions and how they can and can not be made; have stated that FDU-3 was a hydrogen explosion. The Comprehensive Test Ban Organization (CTBTO) has stated that their analysis of the effluent from the FDU-3 explosion reveals that it was a hydrogen explosion:
http://www.ctbto.org/press-centre/highlights/2011/fukushima-related-meas...
The CTBTO’s monitoring system, custom-tailored to detecting nuclear explosions, can detect a range of radioactive isotopes, among them Iodine-131 and Caesium-137. Looking at the ratios between the various radioactive isotopes – in particular Caesium-137 – enables the source of the emission to be identified. In the case of the current readings, findings clearly indicate radionuclide releases from a damaged nuclear power plant, which is consistent with the recent accident at Fukushima in Japan.
The forum's resident MORON dismisses the results of the CTBTO which is part of the United Nations; because they took a month to release their findings and didn't release their results on the same day as the FDU-3 explosion.
This poster's brain is mentally deficient and can't understand that it took a few days for the effluent to reach CTBTO monitoring stations, and that the samples had to be counted for an extended period of time. The CTBTO stated above that the most important isotope was Cesium-137 for their analysis. The scientists that follow this forum know that the counting time required is related to the half-life. Counting time for the 30 year half-life Cesium-137 exceeds what is necessary to count the 8 day half-life Iodine-131. It is completely understandable that the analysis would be released in a 30 day time frame. The mentally deficient poster above postulates a "cover up" by the United Nation's CTBTO because the results weren't available on the same day. That's just a continued demonstration of this MORON's abject STUPIDITY
In addition, we have covered the physics of nuclear explosions and how the fuel available at Fukushima is too dilute, that there was only one explosive material, the hydrogen gas; hence the required explosive lenses for a nuclear explosion was not available, and how the yellow fireball is indicative of an explosion temperature of a few thousand degrees which is consistent with a hydrogen explosion; and NOT the tens of millions of degrees that would be the hallmark of a nuclear explosion. Going over the details of the above physics is just "casting pearls before swine".
Rude Dog
Hey Rude Dog,
Keep that lying up! We are used to it, from you.
TTFN
If he's lying...
If he's lying, then you should have no trouble countering those lies instead of just making vacuous assertions. What part was he lying about? Did the weapons labs and the Comprehensive Test Ban Organization say that the FDU-3 explosion was or was not nuclear.? What is the supposed lie? Or don't you know?
2nd person
Rude Dog,
Lying in the 2nd person, is hardly a disguise.
You are still the Rude Dog and by DEFAULT, you lose.
It is a lie, because you are a liar; and WE know it.
TTFN
Not very likely
;)
Not buying it
Word on the street, for some time, has indicated that a version of the Stuxnet worm was found in the Fukushima Nuclear Plant control systems. This was detected months before the earthquake. Lots of geek-chatter about this, on the internet, months ago. I think that report is likely.
The Stuxnet malware was, or is residing in computers and thumb-stick memory devices all over the world. The worm was reportedly, primarily designed to disrupt the Iranian centrifuge efforts. But like any virus, it travels. There are now several versions and the code techniques are well documented.
Cooling water valves and H2 vent valves and other emergency systems rather dramatically 'did the wrong things' during the Fukushima crisis. Whether or not some version of the Stuxnet malware was involved is out of my paygrade. Whether the possible Stuxnet contribution was Murphy's Law in action, or a deliberate attack; is WAY out of my paygrade.
This thread fingers, without documentation, Israel for an alleged deliberate attack on , Siemens control systems in GE Mark-1 reactor systems in Japan. None of these allegations seems plausible, but I shall withhold judgement, pending evidence.
Japan has LONG held the technical capability to produce atomic weapons, so the atomic bomb allegations seem pretty weak. If Israel attacked everyone favoring a Palestinian State, it would result in a civil war; as well as a battle against most of the UN membership. This is thus, a weak or non-existent pretext for any particular action by Israel.
You are correct to be skeptical
The above about Stuxnet affecting a reactor control system is a bunch of nonsense.
Reactors don't use programmable controllers; the entire reactor control system is hard-wired logic. There's no software; there's no program; the circuitry is the program. It's like your stereo amplifier. If Stuxnet were introduced to your stereo's amplifier could it turn it into an oscillator? NO - you have amplifier circuitry and that's all that circuitry can do. It can't be modified.
You have here the case of some nitwit that grew up in the "digital generation" and thinks that everything can be reprogrammed. These systems were designed decades ago, and they were designed to be robust; which means free from being able to be hacked. What better way to make a system that can't be hacked than to make a system that doesn't follow a program. The circuitry is the program and therefore the program can't be changed without changing the circuitry.
But the nitwits that grew up in the "digital generation" don't know about that.
We have a nitwit attempting to "spin" a fantasy version of the facts; but all the while is totally clueless that they are proving their own incredulity because they don't understand the technology from a few decades back.
Tinfoil.
Tinfoil.
pretty hat
I like gold ribbons and dollar bills festooning my hat...
Think Darth Cheney with a festive helmet, visiting the paper offering money for a big ad campaign (how wonderful a BWR could be in their backyard) but insisting that they write and run a certain article as described in the OP as a precondition to placing the adverts..
Ha, but the foil is useless
Ha, but the foil is useless unless you form it to the shape of a faraday cage!
How Much Truth, How Much Conjecture
All the players sound like criminals that know they are above the law. A strong parallel to the global financial cabal and the way they operate...same people ?
Wild stuff. Looking for information......
tons of proof
http://jinnwe.com/quest.php?id=419
a complete breakdown there with tons of proof..... these lunatics have nuked japan... again... and are holding them hostage
http://www.rense.com/general9
http://www.rense.com/general94/secbb.htm