Xenon-133 and caesium-137 releases into the atmosphere from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant:
http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/28319/2011/acpd-11-28319-2011....
"Abstract. On 11 March 2011, an earthquake occurred about 130 km off the Pacific coast of Japan's main island Honshu, followed by a large tsunami. The resulting loss of electric power at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant (FD-NPP) developed into a disaster causing massive release of radioactivity into the atmosphere. In this study, we determine the emissions of two isotopes, the noble gas xenon-133 (133Xe) and the aerosol-bound caesium-137 (137Cs), which have very different release characteristics as well as behavior in the atmosphere. To determine radionuclide emissions as a function of height and time until 20 April, we made a first guess of release rates based on fuel inventories and documented accident events at the site. This first guess was subsequently improved by inverse modeling, which combined the first guess with the results of an atmospheric transport model, FLEXPART, and measurement data from several dozen stations in Japan, North America and other regions. We used both atmospheric activity concentration measurements as well as, for 137Cs, measurements of bulk deposition. Regarding 133Xe, we find a total release of 16.7 (uncertainty range 13.4–20.0) EBq, which is the largest radioactive noble gas release in history not associated with nuclear bomb testing. There is strong evidence that the first strong 133Xe release started very early, possibly immediately after the earthquake and the emergency shutdown on 11 March at 06:00 UTC. The entire noble gas inventory of reactor units 1–3 was set free into the atmosphere between 11 and 15 March 2011. For 137Cs, the inversion results give a total emission of 35.8 (23.3–50.1) PBq, or about 42% of the estimated Chernobyl emission. Our results indicate that 137Cs emissions peaked on 14–15 March but were generally high from 12 until 19 March, when they suddenly dropped by orders of magnitude exactly when spraying of water on the spent-fuel pool of unit 4 started. This indicates that emissions were not only coming from the damaged reactor cores, but also from the spent-fuel pool of unit 4 and confirms that the spraying was an effective countermeasure. We also explore the main dispersion and deposition patterns of the radioactive cloud, both regionally for Japan as well as for the entire Northern Hemisphere. While at first sight it seemed fortunate that westerly winds prevailed most of the time during the accident, a different picture emerges from our detailed analysis. Exactly during and following the period of the strongest 137Cs emissions on 14 and 15 March as well as after another period with strong emissions on 19 March, the radioactive plume was advected over Eastern Honshu Island, where precipitation deposited a large fraction of 137Cs on land surfaces. The plume was also dispersed quickly over the entire Northern Hemisphere, first reaching North America on 15 March and Europe on 22 March. In general, simulated and observed concentrations of 133Xe and 137Cs both at Japanese as well as at remote sites were in good quantitative agreement with each other. Altogether, we estimate that 6.4 TBq of 137Cs, or 19% of the total fallout until 20 April, were deposited over Japanese land areas, while most of the rest fell over the North Pacific Ocean. Only 0.7 TBq, or 2% of the total fallout were deposited on land areas other than Japan."
http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/28319/2011/acpd-11-28319-2011....


Data Diddling
;)
And it was apparently a great, staged data-diddling episode indeed.
If the data is to be believed, we must accept that the total radionuclide release to the environment washout was about 5 kg.
http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/5774#comment-21635
The math is simple and correctly worked, (dimensional analysis) thus the data has been diddled.
Pure, 100%, unadulterated, pseudo-scientific fraud ... again.
It is a close race between the: global financial system, climate change, POTUS birth qualification, federal court system, and radionuclide releases for the winner of the 21st century fraud awards. Perhaps it is a 4-way tie.
That's about right!
If the data is to be believed, we must accept that the total radionuclide release to the environment washout was about 5 kg.
===========================================
The radioisotopes that we are worried about here, I-131, Cs-137, Sr-90...are all fission products. They were created in the fission of the fissile fuel. Most of the fission products, which have substantial kinetic energy upon creation, come to rest within the crystal structure of the uranium dioxide ceramic fuel material. These atoms are trapped in the crystal, just like any other atom would be.
It is the fission products that come to rest in the very thin annular gap between the ceramic fuel pellets and the zirconium cladding tube that are free to be released when the zirconium cladding tube oxidizes due to the overheating condition.
The amount of fission products in all the tubes per reactor is a fraction of a kilogram. So for 3 reactors and 4 spent fuel pools; about 5 kilograms is about right for the total fission product radioisotope inventory that is available to be released.
Try a Lie
;)
What is this, try a new lie day?
Hidden in the crystalline matrix of melted UOx and in the case of Unit-3 ... PuOx.
Pathetic ...
There ARE, generally speaking, NO spaces in crystalline structures.
We can, for example, in the crystal FORMATION process, substitute an electron shell 3 or 5, for a similar size 4. The up/down charge substitution will slightly distort the crystalline matrix and convert the crystal into a semi-conductor.
;) Well DUH, the Zircalloy
;)
Well DUH, the Zircalloy tubes burned up in the high temperatures and sloshing water, spray and steam.
The reactor cores dropped to the floor of the reactors and burned through the containment vessels.
The concrete & metal housing structures were blasted to flight level 60.
Five (5) kg total Fukushima release, my butt.
The old cover story was "no environmental releases are possible".
The new cover story is "1 kg per reactor and 1 kg per spent fuel pool.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=unqh3zI_uHQ
http://www.lyricsg.com/174587/jimmy-buffett/thats-my-story-and-im-sticki...
Molten CORIUM
:)
Oh, and HOW does that crystalline structure thingy work, when the uranium oxide and plutonium oxide are molten and running down the reactor?
That IS what a MELT-DOWN is ...
WOT?
Actually, not sure that substantial gas or liquid would find its way into a crystaline structure. The cubic structure of fluorite, identical to UOx and PuOx is fairly impervious, beyond some tiny amount detectable by mass spec.
Kinda like finding a bunch of hydrogen inside a diamond or other jewel.
66 PBq Cs-137 - ZAMG
*
66 PBq published by ZAMG
Our total a posteriori emission is lower than the first estimate of 66 PBq published by the Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (ZAMG 2011) on 22 March
considerably higher than the estimate of Chino et al. (2011) of 13 PBq
The upper panel of Fig. 5 shows the a priori and a posteriori emissions of 137Cs. The total a posteriori 137Cs emission is 35.8 PBq, 34% more than the first guess emission (Table 3) and about 42% of the estimated Chernobyl emission of 85 PBq (NEA, 2002). Our total a posteriori emission is lower than the first estimate of 66 PBq published by the Central Institute for Meteorology and Geodynamics (2011) on 22 March, but considerably higher than the estimate of Chino et al. (2011) of 13 PBq. Both previous estimates were based on only few selected measurements. Our emission is in relatively good agreement with the Institut de Radioprotection et de Surete Nucleaire (2011) estimate of 30 PBq caesium (including isotopes other than 137Cs) for the period 12–22 March.
http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/28319/2011/acpd-11-28319-2011.pdf
Supplementary material related to this article is available online at:
http://www.atmos-chem-phys-discuss.net/11/28319/2011/acpd-11-28319-2011-...
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/111025/full/478435a.html
http://www.nature.com/news/2011/111025/full/478435a/box/2.html
The Brooklyn Bridge
;0
I would like to purchase one (1) each of these radionuclide-release data-diddling fictions.
... AND ... the Brooklyn Bridge ...
Disregard the massive, sequential explosions and the nuclear fuel blasted into the stratosphere and the rained-down MOX ... didn't happen ...
Nothing to see here folks ... move it along ...
"Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. The Great and Powerful Oz has spoken."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YWyCCJ6B2WE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-ZYzbkk5X4M
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c0jxooNClM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lFpregq5eJ4
http://www.sing365.com/music/lyric.nsf/The-Emperor's-New-Clothes-lyrics-Sinead-O'Connor/E652C55C3C1D368D482568970005FE2F