Who is behind the EPA info black out/not testing

Submitted by Anonymous on Sat, 2011-10-22 06:03

My purpose is to bump this issue from another recent post? It is easy to pull up the EPA history of lab results for pre and post Fukushima until 2011. Now I can not find where tests are being posted. I am NOT reassured EPA by the none found when I complete a search. I think that was the intent. This really stinks and appears to be purposeful hiding of the truth.

‹ Japanese kitten with deformed eye — Similar to Chernobyl victims (VIDEO) Suggestion - Go to Tokyo, measure radiation, continue on to Fukushima ›

EPA said that they weren't

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2011-11-01 20:50.

EPA said that they weren't going to test on purpose. This was widely reported. Google it.

"None found" is a valid result

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 2011-10-22 09:21.

I am NOT reassured EPA by the none found when I complete a search.
======================================

As explained many times here by the BRAWM team, if the results are less than the statistical uncertainty, then you have an effective non-detection, or "none found".

I know you may be hoping to see more radioactivity released, but when the EPA states that their measurements show "none found", we have to go with their measurements and not your hopes.

"I know you may be hoping to

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2011-11-01 22:26.

"I know you may be hoping to see more radioactivity released, "
WHAT THE HELL IS THE MATTER WITH YOU?
Why are you always so nasty with people?

EPA testing

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 2011-10-22 06:09.

I mean't pre and post Chernobyl testing.

Ganis