Effects of radiation on plant morphology

Does anyone know of any research being done on the possible effects on plant morphology by the Fukushima event? I am on the Pacific Coast and have noticed patterns of unusual plant growth in my immediate area and have had no success so far on finding someone who is informed to inquire to, nor have I found any literature. Thank you.

fasciation

I have several cultivated flowers in my yard this year that are facisciated. I have seen it before, but not in so many varieties. It can be caused by radiation (I've read that there is a lot of it in Fucushima since the nuclear accident). But it is also caused by bacteria or insects. Our county extension agent thinks it may hve been caused by the city spraying insecticides. Also, plants sometimes spontaniously mutate.

PHOTOS OF MUTATIONS CAUSED BY RADIATION*WARNING -GRUESOME!!

These are photos of some mutations that have been occurring due to the radiation releases

This is a photo of a potato recently discovered on a farm in Idaho


Photobucket



Here is a disturbing photo of ants approx 7 Km north of Tokyo. The Japanese Army released this photo last week


Photobucket


This is a very disturbing photo of a Rescue worker at Fukushima. He was removing soil from a potato farm 1/2Km from the reactors. Scientists believe the radiation caused him to experience irreversible trans-genetic effects. WARNING - THIS IS NOT TO BE VIEWED BY THE EASILY DISTURBED


Photobucket

Oh my god! Please next time

Oh my god! Please next time mark NSFW! I think I'm going to be sick.

Slideshow of plants.

For those still following this topic: a slideshow of images of plants:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMCoWmr6u4E&feature=plcp&context=C3f2fe10...

Relevant slideshow

For anyone still following this topic, here is slideshow on topic:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMCoWmr6u4E&feature=plcp&context=C3f2fe10...

Fasciation?

Wild Lily That Has Really Gone Wild in Saitama City, Japan

Interesting photo of a "normal" wild lily...and one "gone wild."

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/09/wild-lily-that-has-really-gone-wild-i...

Some scary and good data here. Spiderwort is radisensitive BRAWM

I urge BRAWM to take a look at the data on Spiderwort which acts as a "canary in the goldmine" for dna mutation from radiation.

Its flowers change from blue to pink when exposed to radiation contamination.

I have seen buttercups near one nuke plant (in a park) turned white (never sen THAT before)and now I can sem to find NO buttervups anymore (I am in the Northeast btw)

Here is a very good study which is frightening because it documents that chronic long term expossure is as bad (re: mutation of dna intergenerationally) as or worse than acute (one time high level) exposure) which is the problem the nuke industry and its supporters have created.

Go to about page 72 in this study for the plant research and spiderwort info. I guess spiderwort plants might be better than a geiger counter to tell us when to get out of Dodge.

Link to the study

If the link is dodgy try googling spiderwort mutation radiation (which is how I found it)

May the Goddess have mercy on us all.

Doses studied are many times background levels

Hi Bill,

Very interesting stuff. I am not an expert in radiobiology by far, but it makes perfect sense that a genetic trait could be sensitive enough to radiation damage that it could have macroscopic manifestations.

For in the study you linked to (I cleaned up the link), it looks like the plants respond at "low levels" of radiation, where "low levels" are much lower than where there would be deterministic effects from radiation (i.e., radiation sickness), but levels that are much higher than normal background levels.

For example, the control sample has an absorbed dose from external gammas of 0.01 in the units they used, with a 0.22±0.03% chance of mutation. The next highest dose they have is 0.35, with a 0.22±0.02% chance of mutation. So at 35 times background, there is no measurable effect. The first measurable effect is seen at 500 times background, with a 0.56±0.05% mutation rate. They continue to see a roughly linear trend at higher doses.

The linear-no-threshold model assumes a linear relationship between total accumulated dose and health risk — i.e., risk is proportional to dose, no matter whether the dose is acute or chronic. This study gives an example of what that linear relationship would look like, and they also see no difference between acute or chronic.

However, the scale of the dose is important. At 500 times background, they see a rate of mutation that is a little over twice the spontaneous mutation rate. But from the fallout from Fukushima in Berkeley, the radiation is a tiny fraction of the background. Is there more risk? Yes, we must assume. But the scale of the risk is very tiny compared with our natural background exposures.

Mark [BRAWM Team Member]

Tradescantia plant family: alternative geiger monitoring system?

Speaking of getting out of Dodge- gee wiz, Bill and Mark, you two done beat me to the draw. I was just planning on posting information on the Tradescantia plant family's ability to act as an effective bioassay for radiation. Small world Dodge City. Another good reference is @ Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tradescantia

The Wikipedia article presents a nice overview of the Tradescantia family of plants, and its sensitivity to radiation and ability to serve as an effective bioassay for ambient radiation levels.

Actually, both of your informative comments nicely compliment the Wikipedia article. And, guess what, more referencing to research in the Wikipedia article's Reference section:

Ichikawa, Sadao (1972). "Somatic Mutation Rate in Tradescantia Stamen Hairs at Low Radiation Levels: Finding of Low Doubling Doses of Mutations". The Japanese Journal of Genetics 47 (6): 411–421.
The Genetics Society of Japan

Laboratory of Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Kyoto University
Abstract:
"Somatic mutation rates from blue to pink were studied in the stamen hairs of Tradescantia ohiensis KU 7 clone, a blue/pink heterozygote, exposed to 100 to 510mR/hr gamma rays or to 12mR/hr scattering radiation. The results obtained supported the previous finding of the sensitive genetic responses of this botanical system, demonstrating that the genetic effect could be detected with this system at a radiation level as low as 3.60R total exposure (also possibly only 0.96R) given at a low exposure rate of 12mR/hr. Pooling the present and previous data, a somatic mutation rate of 3.88 or 3.43×10-4 pink mutant events per hair per R was obtained for gamma-ray irradiation during hair development. The somatic mutation rate calculated for scattering radiation was even higher than this (1.25×10-3). The doubling dose of the somatic mutations at the specific locus was calculated to be 13.8 or 15.6R when irradiated with gamma rays during hair development, and the corresponding value with scattering radiation was 4.29R. Lower doubling doses could be calculated based on published data from the stamen hairs of the same and three other Tradescantia clones irradiated more acutely. These low doubling doses seem to throw doubt on the safety standards of radiations."

And, the summary of SADAO ICHIKAWA's above article:
"Somatic mutation rates from blue to pink were studied in the stamen hairs of Tradescantia ohiensis KU 7 clone, a blue/pink heterozygote, exposed to 100 to 510 mR/hr gamma rays or to 12 mR/hr scattering radiation. The results obtained supported the previous finding of the sensitive genetic responses of this botanical system, demonstrating that the genetic effect could be detected with this system at a radiation level as low as 3.60 R total exposure (also possibly only 0.96 R) given at a low exposure rate
of 12 mR/hr. Pooling the present and previous data, a somatic mutation rate of 3.88 or 3.43 X 10 pink mutant events per hair per R was obtained for gamma-ray irradiation during hair development. The somatic mutation rate calculated for scattering radiation was even higher than this (1.25 x 10-s). The doubling dose of the somatic mutations at the specific locus was calculated to be 13.8 or 15.6 R when irradiated with gamma rays during hair development, and the corresponding value with scattering radiation was 4.29 R. Lower doubling doses could be calculated based on published
data from the stamen hairs of the same and three other Tradescantia clones irradiated more acutely. These low doubling doses seem to throw doubt on the safety standards of radiations."

Note: If you go to the above Wikpedia.org link and in the References section click on: "Ichikawa, Sadao (1972). "Somatic Mutation Rate in Tradescantia Stamen Hairs at Low Radiation Levels: Finding of Low Doubling Doses of Mutations". The Japanese Journal of Genetics 47 (6): 411–421." That link will enable you to get to Sadao Ichikawa's research article.

***

Angusmerlin's final comments:
Turns out the the famous weed, the 'Wandering Jew' hails from the Tradescantia plant family. And, guess what? It's in my backyard. Every morning, now, I go out and check the color of my backyard's Wandering Jew stamens. Let me tell you, those little rascals are really tiny, and a wee bit difficult to see. Happily, so far, the stamens appear to be nice and blue. But, now that I have read Sadao Ichikawa's research article, I realize that I need to check more carefully, because it may be just one, or two stamens spaced between the regular blue that will turn to the irradiated mutated pink color in the presence of the radiation. Hum-m-m.

Well, for those of us, who cannot afford to buy a geiger counter, the Tradescantia plant family may present a cheaper, alternative geiger monitoring system.

Boy, I sure hope those little blue flower stamens don't turn pink!

Unusual plant morphology

Thank you for your reply. I have seen some of the literature on Chernobyl just through googling and it hasn't been very helpful due to lack of specificity (at least what I have seen.) I will do my best to describe what I have seen. I have lived a few miles from the Pacific a hundred (or less) above sea level, for the past dozen years.

I have seen, cross species, a tendency for many plants to grow with unusually long lanky weak stalks (say, twice as long) this growing season, also unusual growth patterns, including what looks like fasciation (new word for me) with my lettuces: the stalks being extremely long, flattened and ribbonlike. I have seen as well (and forgive my lack of proper terminology) a sort of extended bifurcation making for more (and smaller) leafing and flowering. My violets did not have clusters of single leaves but grew as long trailing stalks with multiple branchings of small leaves. One wooded bush has on all branches, an early phase of leafing from mid May where the leaves are dwarved and crumpled and distorted.

I've always been a plant observer and haven't seen this before and would like to better understand what I am seeing. I have done some basic google searches and asked around a bit and haven't found much of anything. The only thing that I did find (and not to my comfort) was a mention of fasciation (that new word!) and overgrowth as a response to radiation in an old published paper.

I would be grateful if you have any references, or If you or any of your colleagues know of any curious and informed botanists who might.have some thoughts on this, or would even like to chat a bit. I have been sitting on my observations for some months now, and just walked past a huge patch of thistles, and decided I should try for some answers.

Thanks again folks out there for any thoughts or other observations.

Odd Leaf Curlings

I noticed odd leaf curling, shrinking and distortion on my Camelias and my lemon verbena plants (in Portland). Both were kept under cover all winter and spring, and only watered with tap water AFTER the worst of the hot rains passed. I can't imaging that the abmient radiation level was high enough to cause this. There has to be a different reason - cold snap during the budding phase maybe?

FYI, for an interesting article on how pines respond to high radiation levels - including photos of deformed trees see http://www.nuclearflower.com/zone/zone08.html

Leaf growth deformities post Fukushima- San Fernando Valley, CA

Yes, indeedie, I have also noted plant leaf growth deformities in my yard as well, since the Fukushima nuclear plant meltdowns (no pun intended). Some of the new growth leaves on my geraniums, for example, now have the bifurcated leaf that you mention, Anonymous. Before Fukushima, I never noticed this bifurcation. Visually, it was different enough that it caught my eye. Have been a few cases of other differences in my yard's green life, as well. But, the geraniums come to mind. If I see more variations, I will note them for you.

There is some research on

There is some research on plant growth around the Chernobyl area. Photos as well. I'm sorry, I don't remember authors or titles, but some of it has been posted online and I saw it few months ago.

Please, elaborate on what you've seen, causally inconclusive at is may be.

This link has some data...