Mainstream Media
Al Jazeera just put forth an article that is highly relevant to this discussion. I was surprised that the last few paragraphs focus on the hot particle issue.
http://english.aljazeera.net/indepth/features/2011/06/201161664828302638...
"Like it or hate it, it is really effective," Clinton said. "In fact, viewership of Al-Jazeera is going up in the United States because it is real news."
"You may not agree with it, but you feel like you're getting real news around the clock instead of a million commercials and, you know, arguments between talking heads and the kind of stuff that we do on our news that is not providing information to us, let alone foreig
Why have alarms not been
Why have alarms not been sounded about radiation exposure in the US?
Nuclear operator Exelon Corporation has been among Barack Obama's biggest campaign donors, and is one of the largest employers in Illinois where Obama was senator. Exelon has donated more than $269,000 to his political campaigns, thus far. Obama also appointed Exelon CEO John Rowe to his Blue Ribbon Commission on America's Nuclear Future.
Dr Shoji Sawada is a theoretical particle physicist and Professor Emeritus at Nagoya University in Japan.
He is concerned about the types of nuclear plants in his country, and the fact that most of them are of US design.
"Most of the reactors in Japan were designed by US companies who did not care for the effects of earthquakes," Dr Sawada told Al Jazeera. "I think this problem applies to all nuclear power stations across Japan."
Just $269,000 is enough to
Just $269,000 is enough to have major influence??
That would be the easily
That would be the easily traceable evidence of collusion.
Of course, the web is much, much larger.
You are right that 300K is chump change in itself at that level. Nonetheless, it is a clear fingerprint, and fits well with all the other clues they weren't able to fully conceal.
Just 269,000? I don't know
Just 269,000? I don't know about you but for me and everyone I know that isn't pocket change.
In brief - They Suck
:(
The ALARM has not been sounded because the MSM SUCKS.
----
The MSM, collectively does not give a tinkers-dam if the citizenry and/or the nation survive until tomorrow.
Watch those circulation numbers plummet, to discover what the American public thinks of the MSM.
In brief, the feeling is mutual.
:(
Excellent
This is a great article thank you.
Al Jazeera is not bad. I knew two people that worked for the Los Angeles office of Al Jazeera.
For a short while, Al
For a short while, Al Jazeera was the focus of this country's daily "two minute hate". Eventually the public's attention was turned towards a more "human" target (Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, and more recently: Julian Assange/Anonymous). Unfortunately a lot of people have a difficult time overcoming their phobia of all things middle eastern. That will change once the CIA starts wearing the Guy Fawkes mask to orchestrate revolution and global cyber attacks. Here's my Nostradamus prediction folks: At some point in the near future a "rogue hacker" (CIA operatives) will hack the Google database and steal everyone Google Search Profile (a database of every website and search string you ISP has ever been tied to) and privacy will be obliterated. Once the document dump starts (think Wikileaks but BIGGER), the masses will demand that some kind "Internet Kill Switch" is put into place, and after that civil rights, freedom, privacy will be a thing of the past.
Gun Powder Plot II
:
My weathervane points the other direction. There are 500 million weapons in private hands along with several billion rounds. This represents more guns and bullets than all the armies ever equipped on earth.
The present regime amounts to 0 Presidents, 1 VP, 100 US Senators, 435 Representatives, 2,400 Federal Judges and about a half-compliment of Senate Confirmed - but still bogus appointees. The federal government is circling the drain - on credit watch. The central bank is already insolvent. The dollar has already been abandoned as an international reserve currency. Nations are rapidly switching back to gold.
There will be a dozen or so armed confrontations with LE SWAT Teams. SWAT will panic and shoot some civilians, which will produce pandemonium. The cops will run like rabbits. Federal law will cease to function.
There will be one (1) to perhaps three (3) skirmishes with the military, with few casualties on either side. There will be orders to shoot, but few takers. The military will stand down or the pandemonium will increase.
The pencil necks will hop their private jets and be gone. At this point, Congress and the courts will go into serious SUCK-UP mode, in an effort to save their own skins from a furious citizenry. Some of them, perhaps many, may succeed.
States, counties, cities and neighborhood associations will maintain a very loose definition of 'law and order'. There will be some islolated incidents of vigilante actions. There will be a few total breakdowns of civilization in Detroit, Chicago and other totally corrupt cities. The follow-on national regime will resemble a stripped-down version somewhat like the Anti-Federalists envisioned.
Things will settle down. Some cities and states will prosper. Others will collapse. There will be some surprises.
I think Mark said it best:
I think Mark said it best: The anon nature of this forum undermines the organic trust process. It's too bad. It would be nice to build a communication and trust with some of the posters here. Well said friend.
Love your post. Not many
Love your post. Not many will get your Guy Fawkes analogy, but it may prompt research.
Re: CIA/Google database infiltration - if that should happen, a hack would not be necessary, considering the cozy nature of Google with governments (guess who goes to Bilderberg and other special elitist functions?) Heck, I wouldn't be surprised if they initiated the idea themselves, then psyop us into thinking they were victimized by "Anonymous" or something.
Google and Facebook are
Google and Facebook are massive focus groups. Your personal life is available to the highest bidder. What have you been Googling for the last ten years? Medication? Physical Ailments? Pornography? Politics? YOU are a Google product not a Google customer.
If you had told me a few
If you had told me a few years ago that I would be adding Al Jazeera and Russia Today to my list of news sources, I would have challenged you to a duel.
With all news sources, it's good to be savvy and keep "what's the agenda here?" uppermost in mind, but I find Western MSM filled with much more nonsense, tabloid stories and propaganda.
Diversify your sources.
This is John Hodges saying:
This is John Hodges saying: Your welcome. Be careful with Russia Today they exploit popular conspiracy theory to pander to a built in consumer base and boost readership. Al Jazeera is probably the least "yellow" source in journalism.
I agree re: RT. Similar
I agree re: RT. Similar tactic used by Drudge, but I scan that each day also.
We sure have be on alert for manipulation, regardless of news sources, don't we?