Wouldn't It Be Scientifically Helpful To Mount Multiple Radiation Sensors To The Golden Gate Bridge?

Submitted by Anonymous on Sun, 2011-07-10 13:09

Wouldn't It Be Scientifically Helpful To Mount Multiple Radiation Sensors To The Golden Gate Bridge?

It's a natural structure which sits directly within the path of least resistance for 'Natural Weather Distribution' into the Bay area isn't it? Isn't that why we always see this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=smXMHZVktVc

Why hasn't anyone thought of that?
__________________

How about doing the same thing up and down the coast at higher elevations like at Point Reyes National seashore, where an abundance of lichens, etc...could be very helpful?

http://www.concord.org/~btinker/gaiamatters/investigations/lichens/radia...
__________________

Instead, why are we conducting the 'shallowest effort of testing' we could 'probably' be doing?

Also- we already have a national water monitoring infrastructure in existence- it's called the USGS Wateralert System. Why couldn't we just add radiation sensors and get 24 hour data like we do for 'specific conductance' 'PH', etc...etc...???

Select California/Water Quality and you get this:
http://water.usgs.gov/wateralert/

Click on a site and that site number when it pops up and then select:

_120 days as opposed to 7
_Select Graph (you can always change it later)
_Available parameter data of your choosing (different sites have different data sets- don't know why there isn't a standard of the most data we can get as there 'should be')
_And you get this:

http://waterdata.usgs.gov/ca/nwis/uv?cb_00060=on&cb_00095=on&cb_00400=on...

Wallah! 'Mission to Mars Nuclear Fallout' detection (somewhat) accomplished.

What are we? Dumb?
__________________

Hasn't UC Berkeley boasted of managing anti-matter (for a practical eternity- blows my mind) utilizing electromagnetic fields recently?

http://www.dailycal.org/2011/06/26/holding-antimatter-is-exciting-step-f...

Don't electromagnetic fields deflect radioactive isotopes? I'm not saying I'm 'certain' we could 'herd' or 'trap' potentially harmful isotopes, thus opening up a new field of 'Remediation', but has anyone considered it?
__________________

Does the Nuclear Industry not recognize an opportunity to do something 'constructive' as opposed to 'destructive'?

Instead Nuclear Science spends all it's energy defending the Airplane Analogy....???

Man...that 'Airplane Analogy' must be pretty important to take so much away from actual 'reality based science', huh?

That 'Grand Unified Theory' of 'Nobody's Seeing Nuthin' must be pretty important.

Well at least we have this forum for education.
Thank you BRAWM Team.

‹ Why Was The Airplane analogy SOOO Important To Nuclear Engineering??? Bring Them To JUSTICE ›

Instead, we get more 'Fukushima styled designed failure'

Submitted by Leo (not verified) on Sun, 2011-07-10 13:30.

Instead, we get more 'Fukushima styled designed failure'.

http://www.doh.wa.gov/Publicat/2011_news/11-105.htm

Helicopter mapping? Static data for ongoing radiation plumes?

Does it take a scientist to recognize that this is 'designed to fail' from the outset and is a complete waste of time and resources?

Are we dumb or are we 'hoping to fail'?

Hey, it's just people's lives, right? Money is more important?

Scientists have families too, right? This affects all of us right?

Recognizing 'Designed Failure' From 'Reality Based Science'?

Submitted by Leo (not verified) on Tue, 2011-07-12 19:00.

'Cradle to Cradle Design' is in diametric opposition to 'Designed Failure':

http://www.ted.com/talks/lang/eng/william_mcdonough_on_cradle_to_cradle_...

The industry soup is 'very thick' and the 'science' is viewed as 'property'...who would think to ask why? "It is what it is."

There is a much Grander Universe out there. The science is relentlessly beautiful in this Grander Universe, from my perspective.

More Solutions Which Industry Is Not Providing

Submitted by Leo (not verified) on Fri, 2011-07-29 13:40.

Here are a couple of ways we can test for alpha particles ourselves. Please read the comments which have valuable scientific information:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-8GlzUjYazs&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WNHGczSVq88&feature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evfmWfXctF0

I would encourage testing lichens at higher elevations, soil at the bottom of 'downspouts' could prove interesting accumulation areas. Plastic and organic material which has traveled across the Pacific Sea from the Philippines, China, Japan which has washed up with tides on the beach will likely be a very good indicator as radiation levels increase.

BRAWM and other Industry Funded/Owned Science will continue to repeat 'ad infinitum' that radiation levels along the beaches are all naturally occurring radiation.

Industry Owned Science will attempt to 'scatter' any grass roots efforts of testing by spreading false claims such as "It's too early to test fish'.

It's not too early to test fish or anything else.

It is vitally important that the public proceed with prudence in terms of 'public safety'. That means detoxification. Getting toxins out as soon as they get in is 'key'.

Industry owned science has avoided detoxification like the plague in the face of Fukushima. Why? Such conversations open the door to the reality of the unpreparedness of the Nuclear Industry.

That unpreparedness quickly grew quickly to 'criminal liability' through the ongoing 'cover up'.

We should have focused on public health concerns such as this from the outset. The reason that all focus was placed on Nuclear Industry Protection is that the 'Reality' of this criminal act is 'bad for business'.

I encourage research of (Clinoptilolite) Zeolite- the powder form which has been proven very useful for 'Physical Remediation' in terms of heavy metal detoxification as well as pesticide detoxification etc... (Google 'ETS Zeolite' - I am not affiliated- there is an informative video on the front page. I take it and have had good results i.e. certain symptoms which I've read about on this forum and elsewhere for 'me' have been alleviated)

Phytoremediation: Natural Remediation Of Contaminated Soil/Water

Submitted by Leo (not verified) on Fri, 2011-07-29 16:09.

This is wonderful research material. I would encourage including this material within the newly reformed 'UC Berkeley Department Of Industrial Remediation' Curriculum.

There is so much to do isn't there? Thankfully it will create many (net amount) new jobs across the nation as it provides solutions to this nightmare.

http://arabidopsis.info/students/dom/mainpage.html