radiationnetwork.com detects fukushima faoolut in Hawaii?
Update: 6/11/11, 8:00 A.M. - Hawaii station detects Fukushima Radiation?
Early yesterday morning, at about 3:00 A.M. local time, one of our new Monitoring Stations in Hawaii broadcast a Radiation Alert over the network, reaching a sustained level of over 100 CPM (Counts per Minute) for a period of about 15 minutes, peaking as high as 141 CPM at one point. The readings then subsided to normal background levels of about 37 CPM for that station, but within less than 2 hours, trended quickly up again to over 100 CPM for another 5 minutes or so. The graph at right depicts this activity.
For context, this is the Kauai station, and within the Hawaiin archipelago, Kauai is the main island at the far northwest end of the chain, actually 300 miles from the Big Island of Hawaii, placing it closest to Japan about 3,500 miles away. And to boot, the Kauai station is located on the north shore of the island, in Princeville. You can see the station on the map - the yellow, numbered circle at top left.
The station is operating a traditional Geiger counter, affixed with an external probe built around the same ultra-sensitive, oversized pancake tube as in the Inspector line of instruments, so it is capable of detecting low levels of Alpha, Beta, and Gamma radiation. Data output is through the headphone jack of the survey meter. The Geiger counter is set up for outdoor monitoring, protected from the elements under the eaves of the structure, with the thin mica end window of the Geiger-Mueller tube oriented downward to prevent contamination from possible fallout.
So those are the facts of the case. The question now is, "Did the Kauai station detect radiation emanating from Fukushima?" To answer that, let's review these points:
bullet First of all, the detection was not just a momentary spike in radiation which could be explained by an instantaneous background surge, a software glitch, or a connection aberration, all circumstances that have triggered false alerts before.
bullet The level of detection was three times higher than normal background radiation for that station, and sustained for periods as long as 15 minutes, which rules out random spikes in background.
bullet The sustained levels of high readings, not once but twice, and separated by subsistence to normal levels, tend to rule out a malfunctioning instrument. Having said that, we have a knowledgeable person in Geiger counter design looking into the validity of the data output.
bullet The station reports that "the Geiger counter's integrity was not compromised in any way that we can tell. Safe, dry, under the eaves." and knows of no local explanation for the high readings.
bullet Speculation was of a radiation burst from solar flares, but the recent sunspot activity reported in the news was already over, according to one source. And in the 7 years that I have been continuously monitoring, I have never seen a sustained, elevated radiation level like this from any solar flare activity.
bullet I asked the Kauai station if the elevated radiation detection correlated with any rainfall at that time? Well, Kauai being the "Garden Isle", the predictable response was, "Hard to say, it rains all the time here.", and besides, he was sleeping at 3:00 in the morning. We know that rainfall can contain naturally occurring radioactive contaminants, as even my own tests have confirmed. But my detection was slight, and the Kauai readings were quite significant. And if his radiation hit was rainfall related, why was this the first time his station triggered an alert, given frequent rainfall during the last week he has been monitoring?
bullet Unfortunately, our Monitoring Stations on Maui and the Big Island were not operating at the same time, so we lack confirmation of readings. However, the Big Island station is run by a sailor with extensive experience in meteorology, and a few days ago, he essentially predicted these events, i.e. what he believes to be weather patterns steering radiation fallout from Fukushima to Hawaii.
bullet And with that, my tentative conclusion is that the Kauai station did in fact detect radiation from Fukushima - it looks like it, it smells like it, and it feels like it.


Oahu Radiation Monitor
Looks like someone is monitoring radiation in Oahu:
http://whatreallyhappened.com/WRHARTICLES/oahurad.php
3RD RADIATION HIGH LEVEL DETECTION IN HAWAII
Here it is again, folks:
http://www.radiationnetwork.com/Message.htm
Nobody in Hawaii seems to be aware of this?!
I would be curious to find
I would be curious to find out what the soil samples would look like in Hawaii given the suspicious elevation and proximity to Japan. Do your job EPA!!!
EPA is MIA
After the 3rd High Radiation Spike detected in Hawaii by geiger counters of private citizens, the information was made available at www.radiationnetwork.com over the last week.
Immediately after this, the EPA and Hawaii Department of Health announced that they are removing their monitors from the North Shore of Kauai (where all the high detections have been happening recently) and the North Shore of Oahu. Here is the Hawaii Department of Health's Statement on the removal from July 6. Note that these agencies stated in March that they would be continuing monitoring every three months, and have now stopped monitoring:
http://hawaii.gov/health/radiation/july06update.pdf
Thanks for this info. The
Thanks for this info. The EPA sucks, what a waste.
2ND High Rad Level Detection in Kauai
Today, the radiation network detected a second high radiation spike in Kauai, Hawaii
http://www.radiationnetwork.com/Message.htm
Don't know if this applies or not
But, here's a some information provided by Mark on the BRAWM team regarding rain readings with Geiger counters.
http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/node/4023#comment-7689
Assuming it is traveling
Assuming it is traveling west, I'm wondering if BRAWM's readings would indicate any spikes in a couple-three days from now. On the other hand, there are no any higher than normal readings following the previous Kauai's spike (dated by June 11).
They left out one common
They left out one common (enough) cause of spurious radiation detections: cancer patients.
http://www.militaryphotos.net/forums/showthread.php?36803-Radiothereapy-...
Fukushima Resident
Perhaps a tourist from Fukushima urinated near the radiation monitoring station.
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/national/news/20110630p2g00m0dm106000c.html
"radioactive substances were found in urine samples of all of 10 surveyed children from Fukushima Prefecture in May, where a crippled nuclear power plant is located, a local citizens group and a French nongovernmental organization said Thursday."
http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20110627p2g00m0dm004000c.html
News
Internal radiation exposure found in all 15 people surveyed in Fukushima
HIROSHIMA (Kyodo) -- Radiation experts said Sunday they had found internal radiation exposure in all of the 15 people they surveyed in May in areas 30-40 kilometers from the crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant.
http://radiationnetwork.com/M
http://radiationnetwork.com/Message.htm
Thanks for posting
Thanks for posting that.....if it looks, quacks, and acts like a duck? Good chance it's a duck....
Yes. But, what kind of duck is it?
The EPA deployable air monitor in Kauai monitoring "average gamma exposure rate" doesn't show any spikes:
http://www.epa.gov/japan2011/rert/radnet-kauai-exp-rate.html
And neither does the stationary air monitor in Honolulu monitoring "gamma gross count rate":
http://www.epa.gov/japan2011/rert/radnet-honolulu-bg.html
Getting more granular (looking at just 6/9 thru 6/11) in Honolulu with the EPA RadNet Query Interface doesn't show anything in the gamma ranges during that period either:
https://cdxnode64.epa.gov/radnet-public/query.do
The EPA doesn't have a working beta gross count report.
I trust radiationnetwork
I trust radiationnetwork slightly more that the EPA
http://pstuph.wordpress.com/2011/04/04/radnet-or-sadnet-the-epas-failed-...
Radiation Network gone?
Does anyone know why radiation network is down or recently removed from the internet again?
Old info
From what I have seen, the EPA has cleaned up many of the lapses in the Radnet system since that embarassing article was written.
While I've referred to the radiationnetwork site many times, overall, I'm not sure I'd put all my eggs in the basket of random people who happened to shell out $100 for a geiger counter and just plugged it in.
This incident is interesting to know about, just one piece of the puzzle.
I take both with a grain of salt
The choices are 1. trust a cost cutting company hired by a good ole boy (and girl) government that showed no elevation, or a private citizen that we don't know and only provided a gross CPM graph that says something MAY have passed through and MAY be significant. In the absense of more definitive data, I'll have to consider this a wash and go on with my life as best as possible.
I know the guy who has the
I know the guy who has the Geiger on Kauai. EPA public is not reliable. Check out the CTBTO, esp. German affiliate's website. Hawaii, and esp. Kauai is getting higher radiation exposure.