Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 2011-06-04 18:21.
"However, only in this way could the human mind have the opportunity to connect and interact telepathically with the Earth´s electromagnetic field as well as with the sun."
Not exactly what I would call hard science, I'm afraid.
Kolkata: There was a huge solar flare in 1859. It was so large that it could be seen with the naked eye. In 1989, a solar storm wiped out Canada's northern electric grid. Canada was out of power for almost three days.
Violent magnetic emissions from the sun could one day destroy all electronic equipment on earth.
An Indian scientist from Indian Institute of Science Education and Research has helped NASA predict when such explosions are likely to happen.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 2011-06-04 18:41.
I'm sure those articles are really nice. I hope they are not written by a guy who is trying, and I quote, "to connect and interact telepathically with the Earth´s electromagnetic field."
When the belt is turning "fast," it means that lots of magnetic fields are being swept up, and that a future sunspot cycle is going to be intense. This is a basis for forecasting: "The belt was turning fast in 1986-1996," says Hathaway. "Old magnetic fields swept up then should re-appear as big sunspots in 2010-2011."
Like most experts in the field, Hathaway has confidence in the conveyor belt model and agrees with Dikpati that the next solar maximum should be a doozy. But he disagrees with one point. Dikpati's forecast puts Solar Max at 2012. Hathaway believes it will arrive sooner, in 2010 or 2011.
"History shows that big sunspot cycles 'ramp up' faster than small ones," he says. "I expect to see the first sunspots of the next cycle appear in late 2006 or 2007—and Solar Max to be underway by 2010 or 2011."
Who's right? Time will tell. Either way, a storm is coming.
"However, only in this way
"However, only in this way could the human mind have the opportunity to connect and interact telepathically with the Earth´s electromagnetic field as well as with the sun."
Not exactly what I would call hard science, I'm afraid.
Yes Canada whent three days no power
http://ibnlive.in.com/news/indian-scientist-helps-nasa-predict-solar-fla...
Kolkata: There was a huge solar flare in 1859. It was so large that it could be seen with the naked eye. In 1989, a solar storm wiped out Canada's northern electric grid. Canada was out of power for almost three days.
Violent magnetic emissions from the sun could one day destroy all electronic equipment on earth.
An Indian scientist from Indian Institute of Science Education and Research has helped NASA predict when such explosions are likely to happen.
Past history of solar storms and effects
http://www.solarstorms.org/SRefStorms.html
I'm sure those articles are
I'm sure those articles are really nice. I hope they are not written by a guy who is trying, and I quote, "to connect and interact telepathically with the Earth´s electromagnetic field."
As well as with the sun
As well as with the sun
Nasa and science it's proven these flares happen !
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2006/10mar_stormwar...
When the belt is turning "fast," it means that lots of magnetic fields are being swept up, and that a future sunspot cycle is going to be intense. This is a basis for forecasting: "The belt was turning fast in 1986-1996," says Hathaway. "Old magnetic fields swept up then should re-appear as big sunspots in 2010-2011."
Like most experts in the field, Hathaway has confidence in the conveyor belt model and agrees with Dikpati that the next solar maximum should be a doozy. But he disagrees with one point. Dikpati's forecast puts Solar Max at 2012. Hathaway believes it will arrive sooner, in 2010 or 2011.
"History shows that big sunspot cycles 'ramp up' faster than small ones," he says. "I expect to see the first sunspots of the next cycle appear in late 2006 or 2007—and Solar Max to be underway by 2010 or 2011."
Who's right? Time will tell. Either way, a storm is coming.
what's up with that crappy
what's up with that crappy graphic. unbelievable.
pick a bale of cotton, pick a bale of hay.
Excellent article. Let's get
Excellent article. Let's get some BRAWM comments on this.
I don't even need to read
I don't even need to read the article, the URL tells me all I need to know.
The answer is, yes, this could happen.