Japan could face overseas lawsuits from nuclear crisis
http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201105300181.html
Japan faces the possibility of having to pay huge compensation to overseas victims of the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant because it has yet to sign any international convention that defines procedures for filing lawsuits for damages from a nuclear accident that extend beyond a nation's borders.


The more they have to pay....
The more they have to pay the more unattractive nuclear power
becomes.
What about the environmental
What about the environmental costs everyone seems to ignore in industrial capitalism?
A very good reason for the
A very good reason for the Japanese to keep information flow about the extent and details of this catastrophe to international media to a minimum.
indubitably.
indubitably.
I think us litigous west
I think us litigous west coast residents should get together and sue TEPCO for pain and suffering at the very least. Let's do what Californians do best - LAW SUIT!
What kinds of lawsuits are
What kinds of lawsuits are you talking about?
To mention one counter example, the state of California has laws in place that make it almost impossible to sue in cases of medical malpractice. That is in part because there is a cap of $250k in place that has the result that you will never find a lawyer representing you even if your loved one was killed by an obvious mistake within the medical establishment. Unless, maybe, if your loved one had income. If he/she wasn't working at the time of the the malpractice (for example if she/he was retired, newborn, or simply unemployed) it will be almost impossible to find legal representation because a lawyer would only be entitled to earn 20-25% of the $250k maximum and this doesn't even cover his/her expenses. And even if you find somebody to take on your case, you'll end up with a ridiculous $150-200k compensation if you're lucky.
There are thousands of examples of citizens of CA losing their health or life and their families never seeing a dime of compensation. This law, called MICRA, was established by the medical and insurance industry lobbyists to ensure increased profits to the industry. The official argument for it was that medical costs would be lowered for the average citizen, but fact is that they have since skyrocketed.
Anyways...I'm just recommending being a bit more cautious when making claims effectively saying that the legal system in CA is friendly to the plaintiff citizens.
In an interview to the Voice
In an interview to the Voice of Russia, an expert in nuclear and radiation security Maxim Shingarkin commented on the situation in Fukushima:
“In fact, this statement came with a big delay. The operating company deliberately concealed this information. The explanation is simple – the company is afraid that any checking by competent experts would reveal its inability to save the situation. Only recently, foreign experts founded a consultative body for the clean-up of the accident’s consequences. Moreover, the company is concealing the information about the amount of pollution of the environment.”
http://english.ruvr.ru/2011/05/30/51015593.html
In other news, some schools near the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant are urging that children continue to wear long-sleeves in summer, to limit their exposure to radioactive fallout.
The schools issued the advice on Wednesday, the day many students switch to summer uniforms. The move is a response to parents' concerns about radioactivity.
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/01_22.html
What freaks me out is that I
What freaks me out is that I just heard on the news that Saudi Arabia seriously plans to build at least 10 nuclear plants until 2030, providing a lousy 20% of their needed energy.
They must have completely lost their minds. Who on earth would sit in the DESERT HEAT building an energy supply that requires massive cooling? At a region of the earth which screams for massive use of solar energy?
Two factors make Saudi
Two factors make Saudi Arabia inherently vulnerable to regional threats. First, Saudi Arabia has natural resource endowments that expose it to foreign attack. The Kingdom encompasses a vast territory of approximately two million square kilometers, making the country about 1/5th the size of the United States. Riyadh, the capital, is located in the center of Saudi Arabia, but its other major cities and economic assets are located on borders where they are more exposed to attack, mainly along bodies of water such as the Persian Gulf and Red Sea.[16] For example, many Saudi oil fields and water desalination plants are located along the Gulf coast.[17] Second, Saudi Arabia possesses twenty percent of proven global oil reserves and produces more oil than any other member of the Organization of Oil Exporting Countries (OPEC).[18] These large oil deposits make Saudi Arabia a crucial participant in the international energy market. Bahgat argues that these two geo-strategic characteristics make Saudi Arabia inherently vulnerable to threats made by stronger neighbors.[19]
Saudi Arabia’s location in the Middle East is also mentioned as a potential motivator for it to acquire nuclear weapons. Saudi Arabia is relatively weak militarily, but is situated near several strong, potential adversaries, primarily Iran and Israel. Although Saudi Arabia does not currently face any existential threats to its survival, Saudis fear encirclement by these regional adversaries. According to Richard Russell of the Naval Postgraduate School, Saudis have been particularly worried about foreign invasion since Iraq’s incursion onto Kuwait territory in 1990.[20] Saudi Arabia has purchased more advanced, mobile conventional weaponry to mitigate its conventional inadequacies. Yet, despite these upgrades, Saudi Arabia’s conventional military is still at a relative disadvantage compared to other countries in the region due to the small population of the Saudi Kingdom.[21] These fears were heightened after the major regional rivals of Saudi Arabia – namely Israel in the late 1950s and Iran more recently – begun to develop weapons of mass destruction.[22]
http://www.nti.org/e_research/e3_40a.html
Why do some people see so
Why do some people see so little beauty in the most basic life we could all enjoy in peace and harmony? What am I missing that I don’t hold any value in the directions the people entrusted to be in charge are plowing us all into? If the recipe that leads us here (creation of huge energy production needs etc) creates a deadly or negative outcome, then you change the recipe and\or method for a better outcome. After Fukushima, the obvious lesson is that NO ONE KNOWS HOW TO CONTROL RADIATION….therefore, the LAST THING ANYONE SHOULD BE DOING is building more of such future unmanageable problems.