Milk update 5/23
5/23 (9:40pm): Milk samples with Best By dates of 5/26 and 5/31 were added to our Milk results. We have our fifth non-detection of I-131 in milk, and Cs-134 and Cs-137 both continue to decline.
Mark [BRAWM Team Member]
Search
5/23 (9:40pm): Milk samples with Best By dates of 5/26 and 5/31 were added to our Milk results. We have our fifth non-detection of I-131 in milk, and Cs-134 and Cs-137 both continue to decline.
Mark [BRAWM Team Member]
Thank you
As far as cover ups, the NRC told you there was a meltdown within
a week of the earthquake. Apparently you chose to place your beliefs
or hopes in TEPCO and the Japanese govt.
As far as what the BRAWM team has been saying about risk, they never
claimed it was "safe". What they did claim, like all the govt agencies,
was that it was an EXTREMELY small amount. And with all the other
exposures from natural and even previous un-natural sources, this
additional exposure is the equivalent of a fart at a sewage plant
(sorry to be so crude). You can believe that or not. But, it's general
knowledge that we are already exposed to elements that "mutate dna
and cells and cause potential cancers due to the Petkau effect" on
a daily basis. Living causes cancer.
"the NRC told you there was
"the NRC told you there was a meltdown within
a week of the earthquake."
Do you have a link? I smell BS.
Still waiting for the link
Still waiting for the link from the NRC prior to April 1 that confirms meltdowns in 3 reactors........
I think I smell a fart in a sewage plant.
Bam bam
Really a fart at a sewage plant ha ha. I think three nuclear reactors melted down, had explosions .fuel pond/s had criticality if u want to discount these implications for our ocean and land and air that's your choice .I won't be that pawn.
I'm sorry. I thought were talking about milk here....
If you want to cover *everything*, why not bring Pearl Harbor into the
discussion?
Honestly, we can go over the top on this, but we *are* talking about what
we are seeing here in the US. No? And while some may not agree with the
"fart in a sewage plant" anology, I think my point was clear. If you are
already in horrible environment (if natural background radiation can be
deemed "horrible"), then a tiny, miniscule, insignificant amount more
"horrible" doesn't make any difference.
So are levels in milk now lower than pre-Fukushima?
We're still drinking powdered milk and individual horizon milks packaged prior to March 11. Am I mistaken or are the levels in homogenized milk now lower than pre-Fukushima?
Can I take my unused powdered milk back? :)
there was no cesium
there was no cesium pre-Fukushima. I'm still not drinking the milk until we have a few weeks of non-detects for Cesium-137
Great news...thanks again
Great news...thanks again for your work!