Air update 5/23

5/23 (6:11pm): Air results were updated with our most recent sample, collected from 5/10-5/14 and counted for a 9 days. We have had our second non-detection in a row for I-131, and Cs-134 and C-137 continue to be at very low levels.

Mark [BRAWM Team Member]

Mark and BRAWM crew- Thank

Mark and BRAWM crew-

Thank you very much.

Signal to noise elsewhere is very bad.

Following up on something I posted last week...

Could be coincidence, or maybe, just maybe, I stumbled on to something when I "predicted" about a week ago, in a different Forum thread ("[R. Cromack] Radiation levels increasing at Fukushima Dai-ichi?"), that we might see a slight -- and, hopefully, temporary -- uptick in U.S. air radiation levels following a 3% or so rise in monitored radiation levels at the three more or less permanent stations at the plant.

On May 14, following weeks of steadily declining radiation levels at the plant, the station at the South Side of Fukushima Dai-ichi's main Office Building reported a slight rise, that lasted five days. This "bump" was shortly echoed at the plant's other two monitoring stations. A few days later, I speculated that BRAWM MIGHT, conceivably, report nominal increases in airborne radiation levels beginning about five days following the rise at Fukushima. Today, right on schedule, BRAWM has, indeed, posted results (via Mark) that reflect a 30% jump in the ever-so-minor Cs-137 levels over the previous result.

Important to note that these are still VERY LOW levels, and that Cs-134 continues to decrease -- and at roughly the same rate as has been established over the past several weeks of constant monitoring by BRAWM. I should also point out that, in spite of continuing, ever-lower "threshold" detection levels, I-131 as NOT detected, again. And it is likely that this most recent sample's slightly elevated result for Cs-137 is within the test's margin of error.

However -- having presented a "testable hypothesis", of sorts, it seems to have been validated. Any comments / alternative explanations / opinions?

Rick Cromack.
Allen, Texas

The air samples are from May

The air samples are from May 10-14.

Thanks Mark for posting the

Thanks Mark for posting the results and BRAWM for the hard work.

Just a question, I know there is probably no way to tell, but, is it plausible that the increased levels of Cesium 137 detected are the result of previous depositions or they clearly indicate new radioactive plumes arriving from Fukushima?

Thanks, Mark!!!

This is continued good news.

You probably have explained this already, but any idea why I-132
shows up from time to time?

Thanks -- I fixed that

Thanks -- I fixed that (again). Sometimes in recent weeks I-132 has been listed accidentally as a detection. The reason is that as we have been counting the samples for longer and longer times, there are two very weak background lines that begin to appear at the same locations as two of the strongest I-132 lines. The easiest way to tell the difference between the background lines and I-132 is that I-132 (2 hour half-life) is only present when its "parent" Te-132 (3.2 day half-life) is also present. Neither has been detected (for real) since about 3/30.

Mark [BRAWM Team Member]

Got it

Thanks again.