BRAWM Team: EPA Plutonium-239 Detection On 3/18
Before everyone panics, PLEASE read the info immediately below FIRST:
*******************************************************************
***BEFORE Fukushima, there have been LOTS of very low level air
detections of plutonium by the EPA across the US***
In the EPA western region alone, the EPA has reported:
194 detections of Pu-239 since 1978. 65 since 1990. 12 since 2000. With
the last detection from the sample ending on 12/31/2008.
183 detections of Pu-238 since 1978. 74 since 1990. 28 since 2002. With
the last detection also from the sample ending on 12/31/2008.
For *all* EPA regions, the EPA has reported over 3700 plutonium detections
since 1978. 1169 since 1990. And 277 since 2000.
So, what I'm talking about below isn't necessarily a huge event.
You can perform your own queries at the following link:
http://www.epa.gov/enviro/facts/radnet/customized.html
*******************************************************************
Now, that being said, I would like the BRAWM teams thoughts.
It appears that the EPA reported the detection of Pu-239 in their
3/15-3/18 air sample.
They reported 0.0000065 pCi/M^3 (2.40741E-10 Bq/L) in San Francisco.
This is above their CSU of 0.0000058 pCi/M3. So, it should be considered
an actual detection.
Please give us your thoughts on this detection and the amount.
And we are eagerly awaiting the BRAWM plutonium results.


re-branding!
I heard a little story toady about a Brazilian company that bought beef that was contaminated by Chernobyl. Since they couldn't sell it in Brazil, they canned it and sold it to Africa.
Wonder how much of that re-labeling will go on this time around...
Given that Japan is pressuring China and S. Korean to lighten up
I wouldn't be surprised by the re-labeling. Japan has quickly shown its
priority is business over health. They wasted no time in removing the
restrictions on foods from contaminated areas. And they are lobbying
with some at least some initial success to get China and S. Korea to
ease up on their restrictions on Japan.
http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/23_05.html
As BRAWM members have
As BRAWM members have stated:
A reading of more than twice the Combined Standard Uncertainty is needed to declare a detection.
Anything less than twice the CSU is not considered a viable detection.
No sense in ignoring available data
The EPA reported the following detections of plutonium (238 or 239)
that were at least 2x the CSU:
2179 detections since 1978
350 since 1990
48 since 2000
Again, the last detections were from sample periods ending 12/31/2008.
So, even if we take the 2x CSU technicality into consideration, detecting
plutonium in recent years is still not a rare event.
Ah. Well, that's a relief
Thanks for the quick response.