I received key for gamma rays and normal ranges for each element from EPA

Thank you for contacting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. We
appreciate your concern. It’s important to know that the U.S. Nuclear
Regulatory Commission has said we do not expect to see radiation at
harmful levels reaching the U.S. from damaged Japanese nuclear power
plants.

The Environmental Protection Agency maintains a nationwide radiation
monitoring system known as RadNet. This system continuously monitors the
nation's air and regularly monitors drinking water, milk and
precipitation for environmental radiation. As of 3:00pm (EDT) April 19,
2011, EPA's RadNet radiation air monitors across the U.S. show typical
fluctuations in background radiation levels. The levels detected are far
below levels of concern.

Data from each fixed RadNet monitor are transmitted to EPA’s National
Air and Radiation Environmental Laboratory hourly. These data include
the gamma radiation measured during that hour. The data are screened
against pre-set values for each monitor to identify unusual readings,
particularly elevated radiation levels. In order to increase sensitivity
for screening the spectrum for small increases in gamma radiation, EPA
divides the gamma radiation measurement data into nine different gamma
energy ranges that collectively cover the energy spectrum where
essentially all of the nuclides of concern will be detected by our
monitors.

When the RadNet computer system detects a reading from a monitor that is
outside the range of background levels typically seen by that monitor,
those data are flagged to be reviewed by a trained EPA scientist. The
review includes obtaining the gamma spectrum stored in the monitor and
evaluating that spectrum for both natural and man-made nuclides.

EPA scientists use a science called gamma spectrometry to evaluate the
complete spectrum of the monitor’s specific calibration to detect the
type and amount of gamma emitting radioactive material at that location.
In this way, EPA scientists are able to determine what specific isotopes
are present in the air at any given time.

For information on the energy ranges for the gamma charts:
The following table shows the energy ranges that correspond with the
gamma charts on our website. Radioactive material from Japan could be
seen in various energy ranges, depending on the specific radionuclide.
Iodine-131 and cesium-137 would primarily be seen in ranges 3 and 5,
respectively, along with other naturally occurring radioactive
materials.

Please note that fluctuations in the gamma readings may be caused by a
number of factors, primarily naturally occurring radioactivity in the
environment. Two of the most prominent naturally-occurring radionuclides
in air are lead-214 and bismuth-214. Natural levels of these nuclides
fluctuate significantly in the environment and their primary gamma
energies are similar to those of cesium-137 and iodine-131. When the
RadNet computer system detects a reading from a monitor that is outside
the range of background levels typically seen by that monitor, those
data are flagged to be reviewed by an EPA scientist. The review includes
obtaining the gamma spectrum stored in the monitor and evaluating that
spectrum for both natural and man-made nuclides.

Energy Ranges

Energy | Gamma Energies
Range | (keV)
Number |
---------+---------------------
1 | Reserved by
| software for
| instrument
| stabilization
---------+---------------------
2 | 100-200
---------+---------------------
3 | 200-400
---------+---------------------
4 | 400-600
---------+---------------------
5 | 600-800
---------+---------------------
6 | 800-1000
---------+---------------------
7 | 1000-1400
---------+---------------------
8 | 1400-1800
---------+---------------------
9 | 1800-2200
---------+---------------------
10 | 2200-2800

As part of the federal government's continuing effort to make our
activities and science transparent and available to the public, the
Environmental Protection Agency will continue to keep all RadNet data
available in the current online database. Please see
www.epa.gov/japan2011 for more information.

Gamma Energy Ranges

This looks like it might be useful? It's a chart of the gamma energy range for different nuclides:

http://www.csupomona.edu/~pbsiegel/bio431/genergies.html

isotope energies

Hmmm. Pretty interesting if you read the chart and consider that I-131, one of our "new visitors", has a gamma energy level of 284 KeV, while K-40, found regularly at much higher concentrations in milk (per recent BRAWM postings)has a much higher gamma energy of 1460 KeV. To say nothing of an remarkably long half life.

This seems to put some of our concerns about the fallout into some (more hopeful) perspective, if I'm interpreting things correctly.

There's a lot of interesting

There's a lot of interesting stuff going on here! Especially since the post below this mockingly brought up the "banana equivalent dose"...

You're correct that the K-40 gamma ray has much higher energy than I-131. This doesn't necessarily mean it's more damaging to the body, though, because higher energies have a smaller chance of interacting with the body. When it does interact, though, it does more damage. Kind of a trade-off going on.

The beta particle, however, is what interacts more with your body. The dose that we ascribe to these isotopes is actually primarily based on the beta radiation, while the gamma radiation is just how we find out that it's there. In terms of energy, the K-40 beta is 1311 keV, while the I-131 beta is 606 keV. In that sense, K-40 is twice as damaging.

There's one more thing to consider though! As people have continually pointed out, iodine accumulates in the thyroid while potassium is more of a whole-body dose. All of these varying factors are taken into account when we calculate the dose -- energy, half-life, type of particles emitted, and biological accumulation. We do our best to provide you with the most accurate dose numbers.

Tim [BRAWM Team Member]

Explananation

Hi Tim,

Thanks for the explanation. Glad you and the team are teaching us so much.

i second that!

Thanks for the insights Tim, makes complete sense and is helpful :-)

Banana Equivalent Dose.

Banana Equivalent Dose.

Cesium 137 is not a naturally occuring isotope

"Radioactive material from Japan could be
seen in various energy ranges, depending on the specific radionuclide.
Iodine-131 and cesium-137 would primarily be seen in ranges 3 and 5,
respectively, along with other naturally occurring radioactive
materials."

From Wikipedia:

Caesium-137 (137
55Cs, Cs-137) is a radioactive isotope of caesium which is formed as a fission product by nuclear fission.

Caesium-137 is unique in that it is totally anthropogenic. Unlike most other radioisotopes, caesium-137 is not produced from its non-radioactive isotope, but from uranium.[5] It had not occurred on Earth for billions of years until created by controlled fission reactions. By observing the characteristic gamma rays emitted by this isotope, it is possible to determine whether the contents of a given sealed container were made before or after the advent of atomic bomb explosions. This procedure has been used by researchers to check the authenticity of certain rare wines, most notably the purported "Jefferson bottles". [6]

Why would the EPA state that it is naturally occuring? Since when?

Ummm... the EPA never

Ummm... the EPA never claimed it was naturally occurring, just that there are some naturally occurring isotopes that also have similar radiation signatures as Cs-137. Perhaps a comma in that sentence to make it more clear?

"...along with other, naturally occurring radioactive materials."

Tim [BRAWM Team Member]

Wow!

Amazing that you were able to get this. Thank you!

I just want to say thank you very much

for post this!

Yw and glad I was able to

Yw and glad I was able to get it, share it. FOIA