Submitted by Bill (not verified) on Thu, 2011-04-21 17:37.
the interviewee kept saying "IF" we see any radioactivity showing up here --- as if they had no cognizance whatsoever of the BRAWM team results or even the EPA RADNET results.
I watched this and was surprised that there as virtually NO discussion of what, if any, health effects would be from the levels showing up in milk, spinach, mushrooms, etc and NO discussion of potassium iodide or ANY preventive measures to be taken (one way or the other).
It was very strange.
Either they were unfamiliar that radiation is showing up in the air, water, food, milk, etc or they had no clue what those results were or what they meant. Very disappointing. AT LEAST I would expect them to KNOW what the exposure or contaminations are if, as advertised, they were going to discuss the health effects on US population.
REALLY disappointed. And I have been very grateful for Gundersen's work in the past, but this (as was his forum with Deepak Chopra) was really a bit of a waste of time except insofar as it dwelt on strategies for change in the future and "better" reporting by the FDA (yeah right)
I was very disappointed with this interview
the interviewee kept saying "IF" we see any radioactivity showing up here --- as if they had no cognizance whatsoever of the BRAWM team results or even the EPA RADNET results.
I watched this and was surprised that there as virtually NO discussion of what, if any, health effects would be from the levels showing up in milk, spinach, mushrooms, etc and NO discussion of potassium iodide or ANY preventive measures to be taken (one way or the other).
It was very strange.
Either they were unfamiliar that radiation is showing up in the air, water, food, milk, etc or they had no clue what those results were or what they meant. Very disappointing. AT LEAST I would expect them to KNOW what the exposure or contaminations are if, as advertised, they were going to discuss the health effects on US population.
REALLY disappointed. And I have been very grateful for Gundersen's work in the past, but this (as was his forum with Deepak Chopra) was really a bit of a waste of time except insofar as it dwelt on strategies for change in the future and "better" reporting by the FDA (yeah right)
oh well. my two cents.
These are good points
These are good points. I would suggest giving Arnie Gundersen your feedback. He seems like a very conscientious fellow, who wants to be of service.
He is. And I expect a
He is. And I expect a commentary on this interview from him because I do not think he is going to agree with all that was said.