Release estimates from fukushima
The estimated 5,000 terabecquerels is far lower than 370,000 to 630,000 terabecquerels, the estimated amount of radioactive substances released into the atmosphere from the plant.
The estimated 5,000 terabecquerels is far lower than 370,000 to 630,000 terabecquerels, the estimated amount of radioactive substances released into the atmosphere from the plant.
I start to hate the Japanese
I start to hate the Japanese and their lazy slow response!!They have no right to impair our health, these criminals!
The Third Nuclear Bombing of Japan
Why hate the Japanese? They were only listening to the nuclear weapons peddler General Electric.
The Fukushima disaster should be seen as the Third Nuclear Bombing of Japan. By America, just like the first two. Sadly, Hiroshima & Nagasaki fully recovered. Fukushima Prefecture, and beyond, will not recover in our lifetimes.
politics
I think this problem has a lot to do with the relationship between the government and the industry. The government has NOT been aggressive at all in this situation. Much like the Gulf oil spill......
Whoa slow down u must
Whoa slow down u must realize usa corporations built Fukushima yes ge was the Corp who built Fukushima .if an accident occurred in us the game plan is stated to be the same ie use fire hoses and portable pumps to douse spent fuel ponds .now as far as Japan having so many nuclear plants and no far reaching extendable fire hose or concrete pumper that may be negligence .it would seem prudent that any nation with spent fuel ponds be required to have this capacity .to pump water high and at a distance to avoid gamma .I believe there's three yes three pieces of this Russian type in world .see article
http://www.ktva.com/news/local/Cement-Pumps-On-Way-To-Japan-119584089.html
http://www.autoblog.com/2011/03/25/meet-the-203-foot-truck-on-its-way-to...
Compared to Chernobyl
If we assume the 630,000 terabecquerels is accurate, it's much
less than Chernobyl. Chernobyl released up to an estimated 5.2
million terabecquerels. Hence the statements made by "experts"
that Fukushima has released 10% of Chernobyl. And while I don't
think anyone can seriously consider Chernobyl anything other than
a monumental disaster, to date, it hasn't brought life as we know
it in Europe to an end. We'll never know for sure the actual
amount of the release. And it ultimately doesn't matter. What
matters is how much we are actually seeing in our environment.
And we are getting that info from the BRAWM team.
No idea how accurate it is, but you can use the following web
site to see the major fallout area from Chernobyl. Just plug in
"Kiev, Ukraine". You can also plug in "Fukushima, Japan". You
can also plug in your favorite city to see how wide spread it
was relative to that.
http://howbigreally.com/dimension/environmental_disasters/chernobyl#cher...
The values for Chernobyl
The values for Chernobyl total output vary. The 5M TBq value includes only the most active nucludes and possibly only Iodine and Cesium.
However, if you take into account all nuclide releases, the estimation is 14M TBq (1.4e19 Bq):
http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/chernobyl/inf07.html
Frick-- thats in TRILLIONS of Becquerels, right?
370,000 to 630,000 TRILLION Becquerels?
Multiply by 27 to get pCi's?
WTF
and this was released into the air, right?
I really am beginning to wonder how sick we might all get over time from this. I fear for my children, my pets, my loved ones.
And now Japan says that radiation in breast milk is safe for mothers to nurse their babies. Buy Fukushima spinach!
Man,
anyone know how many curies that is (my math sucks and I am too depressed to do the math). I heard this announced on NHK but was too dumbfounded to even register it. Plus I had to look up a TeraBecquerel which is 10 to the 1th power (a trillion)
Time to send some DNA to the nearest life supporting planet.
ten to the 12th power
i mean
for anyone curious, this is
for anyone curious, this is in reference to the amounts measured in released/spilt water.
released/split?
Can you explain what you mean by "this is in reference to the amounts measured in released/spilt water"?
In other words that
In other words that measurement doesn't exclusively represent what's in the air, it's also accounting for the radioactive water the plant is releasing into the ocean
Share | Thursday, April 21,
Share |
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Leaks into sea 20,000 times over safe limit
Kyodo
Tokyo Electric Power Co. said Thursday radioactive substances that leaked into the sea from its crisis-hit nuclear plant over six days from April 1 totaled an estimated 5,000 terabecquerels, 20,000 times more than the annual allowable limit for the plant.
The radioactive substances were in an estimated 520 tons of high-level radioactive water that leaked into the sea from the No. 2 reactor of the six-reactor Fukushima No. 1 plant, which was devastated by the March 11 quake-tsunami disaster in the Tohoku region.
The leaks were found on April 2 and were stopped on April 6.
The estimated 5,000 terabecquerels is far lower than 370,000 to 630,000 terabecquerels, the estimated amount of radioactive substances released into the atmosphere from the plant.
Share |
We welcome your opinions. Click to send a message to the editor.
Separate
Seperate estimates I'm afraid.
Good piece on release estimates
Cumulative radiation from Japan plant leads to severe health problems
Japan’s crippled Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant has so far leaked around a tenth of the amount of radiation released in the Chernobyl disaster, data showed on Tuesday, leading some experts to warn of serious long-term health risks.
Japan’s Nuclear and Industrial Safety Agency (NISA) and the Nuclear Safety Commission of Japan estimated cumulative radiation levels at between 370,000 and 630,000 terabecquerels.
Using a median value of 500,000 terabecquerels, that would be nearly 10 percent of the total radiation of 5.2 million terabecquerels released by Chernobyl. The Chernobyl figure was provided by the Japanese agencies.
“If that is the total radiation so far from the time of first leakage, that amount is very serious. It’s undoubtedly very bad. That is close to one-tenth of Chernobyl’s radiation in a month,” said Lam Ching-wan, a chemical pathologist at the University of Hong Kong and member of the American Board of Toxicology.
“It means there is damage to soil, ecosystem, water, food and people. People receive this radiation. You can’t escape it by just shutting the window.”
With Japan widening the evacuation zone beyond the initial 20 km (12 mile) exclusion zone and encouraging children, pregnant women and hospitalised patients to stay out of some areas 20-30 km from the nuclear complex, Lam said he feared the radiation leakage may still be far from under control. [ID: nL3E7FA058].
“The radiation threat is there and there must be national radiation surveillance for health purposes … they must decide if there should be regular screening for cancer,” Lam said.
CALLS FOR LONG-TERM HEALTH MONITORING
Experts are most worried about three radioactive substances — iodine-131, caesium-134 and caesium-137 — all of which can cause various types of cancer years later.
From studies carried out on survivors of nuclear plant accidents in the past, as well as the atomic bombings in Japan during World War Two, the link between exposure to radioactive iodine and thyroid cancer is most convincing.
Although the radioactivity in iodine-131 fully disintegrates in 80 days, it can find its way rapidly into people through the air and through milk and leafy vegetables, lodging quickly in the thyroid gland, where it can cause DNA damage and raise cancer risk, particularly in young children.
Among the people who were exposed to the Chernobyl accident as children, at least 1,800 have gone on to develop thyroid cancer, a study has found.
Experts called for long-term tracking and monitoring of the health of survivors living near the plant as well as the hundreds of nuclear plant workers now battling to get the Fukushima nuclear plant under control.
These studies will help policy-makers make informed decisions when setting aside funding and planning healthcare services in the future, such as cancer screening and therapies.
“You need several metres of concrete to shield yourself from radiation … even lead aprons are not going to help,” said Stephen Law, chief of service of clinical oncology at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Hong Kong.
He said whatever protective material the nuclear plant workers were using would not fully shield them.
“Those workers are the largest group of people now being exposed to a significant radiation dose and this will improve our knowledge of managing radiation accidents,” Law said.
Lam said regular cancer screening would be important for people living near the nuclear plant.
“Thyroid cancer is treatable and early detection raises cure rates. Without monitoring, you will lose the golden window of opportunity to early treatment,” Lam said.
Ben Cowling, a public health associate professor at the University of Hong Kong said such long term studies would be very useful for healthcare planning in the future.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/04/12/us-japan-idUSTRE72A0SS20110412
Total Release from Fukishima
Todays report of 37 Becquerel per liter Iodine 131 in seawater at 30 KM off shore from the reactor calculates to 11 million tera-Becquerel in the seawater alone. This would not count all of the other radionuclides released or what fell on land or has already decayed. This is already much higher than Chernobyl in this, by itself.
Once again, the nuclear industry and government are caught lying. This is a disaster, and it will keep getting worse.
**Once again, the nuclear
**Once again, the nuclear industry and government are caught lying. This is a disaster, and it will keep getting worse.**
I agree.
I find some of these arguments about *total* amounts of release interesting...do people really believe that we have accurate numbers with which to argue????
I know! Why does anybody
I know! Why does anybody believe TEPCO!!!! Or the Japanese government for that matter. And our government doesn't seem to interested in getting the truth to us either.