Why is it that Fukushima and fallout risk/data is not on any nationatal news on TV?

I have had some time off and watching more TV than usual, various news station. I do not understand that there is literally NO news about Fukushima or related topics. NO news information or health education news about types of radiation etc. I am stunned.
Is it because the government is controlling our news?
How can they do it?
Is CNN not independent? I just do not understand-- there is not a single mentioning of Fukushima and current situation/update on national TV?
Anybody knows how that is possible?

reposting from my reply on another thread...seems relevant

This is what we have gotten with our "no child left behind" education system. This is what we get from deregulating "news" or "media" allowing the same companies that commit the atrocities to our planet, and thereby to us, to control all information which is now only propaganda.

You must surely realize how brilliant the corporate machine truly is.

We have a Supreme court that has given the "corporation" status equal and greater than the ordinary citizen, GE and Comcast are partners in NBC...and certainly all media companies need chips and other technology from Hitachi and Toshiba, the corporate connections are everywhere. The media have "re-educated" the naive, un-seeking victim of "no child left behind" to help them realize that these elements are everywhere anyway, so what is the big deal...

Really? WE ARE FEEDING THIS TO OUR CHILDREN! The milk in the store is contaminated, and everything that is made with milk...

Is this the answer to our Social Security system and Medicare going broke problem?

I mean let's see... so your child is 10 now, you are feeding them bits of this in everything...water, it is on the salad, in the milk and cheese, and the meat... so, in about 10 years, at most, our babies will start having symptoms of bone cancer, or thyroid cancer...

If they live 10 more years, they will be lucky...so this generations' life expectancy occurs to be about 30 years... and not likely to produce many healthy children... and with all of this... maybe we can save a few bucks of national debt, so we can give the very companies that caused this, and other horrendous catastrophes, a tax break so they can have more profits for their shareholders... and besides, the big drug companies and medical communities will make bank, so relax... it is good for the "economy" think of all the jobs this will create...hmmmm... brilliantly evil.

Fukushima silence in the news

While the news may be asked or forced to be silent regarding Fukushima; it is my thought, from my experience in unearthing information, that it takes many many hours of time and effort to try and weed through all of the nonsense to get to the primary sources who may or may not know anything themselves. This takes money - or at least time and effort.

It is much easier, and much less expensive, to set up a camera at a royal wedding, red carpet even, or just tell about a monkey being born at a zoo. No controversy. No upsetting the evening meal. No loss of viewers. Just entertain me with warm and fuzzy things. That's the news folks. You're okay and I'm okay. Okay?

Sheepeople...

WE should keep in mind Matthew 24:24 which reads..."Concerning endtimes,
"For there shall arise false Christs and false profits, and shall give false signs & wonders, so as to mislead, if possible, even the elect.

Our Father in heaven puts time of testing on the people, to draw them closer to the TRUTH. His truths..... Find Peace In Christ. Ask him into your life, & He will NEVER LEAVE YOU NOR FORESAKE YOU.

Find His peace, in these most tring times.

"Is CNN not independent? I

"Is CNN not independent? I just do not understand-- there is not a single mentioning of Fukushima and current situation/update on national TV?

Anybody knows how that is possible?"

Haha, really? Are you serious?

Wake up, use your brain, and do your own research.

Its 2011. There's no excuse to be ignorant anymore.

Most of the USA fluoridates

Most of the USA fluoridates its citizenry. What do you think that does to critical thinking capabilities?

Another brilliant corporate

Another brilliant corporate move... got all this toxic waste from the Aluminumm industry... what should we do with it? Dump it in the water.. and if people complain? ...tell them it is good for them. Hahahahahaha! Politics and Corporations...

There is no need to be so

There is no need to be so judgmental and insensitive about it. We all wake up at different points in time. The older and more indoctrinated you are, the more it takes to wake you up. But we are all in this together and we are all vulnerable and fallible.

Sorry, your right. That did

Sorry, your right. That did come off harsh.

To answer your question: No, CNN (or any other news network on TV for that matter) is not independent. They are all influenced by special interest groups that help finance them.

What a lady or gentleman! I

What a lady or gentleman! I love it when someone adjusts their attitude in such a humble way. Kudos.

Listen to Dr Helen

Listen to Dr Helen Caldicott:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TMXvpWoHzeE&feature=player_embedded

http://www.helencaldicott.com/

Pay attention to Arnie Gundersen at http://fairewinds.com/

This is who he is:

Arnie is an energy advisor with 39-years of nuclear power engineering experience. A former nuclear industry senior vice president, he earned his Bachelor's and Master's Degrees in nuclear engineering, holds a nuclear safety patent, and was a licensed reactor operator. During his nuclear industry career, Arnie managed and coordinated projects at 70-nuclear power plants around the country. He currently speaks on television, radio, and at public meetings on the need for a new paradigm in energy production. An independent nuclear engineering and safety expert, Arnie provides testimony on nuclear operations, reliability, safety, and radiation issues to the NRC, Congressional and State Legislatures, and Government Agencies and Officials throughout the US, Canada, and internationally. In 2008, he was appointed by the Vermont Senate President to be the first Chair of the Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Plant Oversight Panel. He has testified in numerous cases and before many different legislative bodies including the Czech Republic Senate. Using knowledge from his Masters Thesis on Cooling Towers, Arnie analyzed and predicted problems with Vermont Yankee’s cooling towers three years prior to their 2007 collapse. His Environmental Court testimony concerned available and economically viable alternatives to cooling towers in order to reduce consumptive water use and the ecological damage caused by cooling tower drift and heated effluents. As the former vice president in an engineering organization, Arnie led the team of engineers who developed the plans for decommissioning Shippingport, the first major nuclear power plant in the US to be fully dismantled. He was also an invited author on the first DOE Decommissioning Handbook. Source term reconstruction is a method of forensic engineering used to calculate radiation releases from various nuclear facilities after nuclear incidents or accidents. Arnie is frequently called upon by public officials, attorneys, and intervenors, to perform source term reconstructions. His source term reconstruction efforts vary. Arnie has calculated exposures to oil workers, who received radiation exposure while working on wells. He has also calculated radiation releases to children with health concerns, who live near a nuclear facility, like the one that carted radioactive sewage off-site and spread it on farmers' fields. Finally, he has performed an accurate source term construction of the radiation releases from the Three Mile Island nuclear accident. Also involved in his local community, Arnie has been a part-time math professor at Community College of Vermont (CCV) since 2007. He also taught high school physics and mathematics for 13 years and was an instructor at RPI's college reactor lab.

Arnie called this mess from

Arnie called this mess from the beginning. He told everyone that this was Chernobyl on steroids. The science doesn't lie. The science has been there this whole time. Two months for Tepco to admit it, and I suspect only because an outside 18-person I.A.E.A. team, which includes experts from the United States, China, Britain and Russia, where to inspect the site today. Of Course, no worrying about what the US, China, and Britain might say, but no controlling those Russians that might just spill the beans... so, we better confess... bet there is so much more to come...

Why listen When u can read what he learned from

Why listen to people with bias ( I respect both don't get me wrong) when u can read this document which has no bias just the data .This is like the holy grail of all thing to do with radiation .A must read if u care pay special attention to Pg 3-12

http://140.194.76.129/publications/eng-manuals/em385-1-80/c-3.pdf

The risk

If u want to learn about exposure and the risks read Pg 3-8 it is far more detailed than brawn FAQ .

at least the russians were quick to bury theirs

Japan is going to be extinct and the whole world is going to have a slow cancer death. We are all being sacrificed to the man downstairs. Make the OZZY salute. Just that metallic taste will not go away.

Oh FFS, really? Are we here

Oh FFS, really?

Are we here again?

I thought all the nutters had finally left.

Just Go Away, you don't have anything of value to add. You are peddling doom. You have no right to cause panic in those affected.

Just. Get. The. Fnck. Out.

peddling doom

Fukushima

Aloha all,

I am sure you have the same sources as I do to monitor the reactor data - thus I shall not presume to explain the data to you, nor shall I suggest that is being suppressed.

The possibility exists that R4 had been de-fueled and was preparing to be re-fueled with MOX, which was being stored in it's cooling pool. The possibility further exists that a catastrophic core explosion in R3 deposited a sufficient portion of R3's core into the R4 cooling pool and created a problem.

The reactor containments for R2 and R3 are breached. R1 is about to go out of control as well and R4 is a sleeping giant.

I can probably quantify my statements if you wish - but I cannot qualify them for specific radionuclides, except that isotopes identified thus far are fissile.

>R1 is about to go out of

>R1 is about to go out of control as well

What's the data you are using to reach that conclusion?

looks like you were wrong

looks like you were wrong buddy. Do I really have to cite sources? Good article in Bloomberg today.....oh well here you go genius!!!1

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-05-12/japan-suffers-setback-at-fukush...

jackass.

How do you view these daily

How do you view these daily wire service reports? this sounds v ery intresting. also have you guys looked at the data of the rise in the EPA numbers of acceptable radiation levels?
"# A nearly 1000-fold increase for exposure to strontium-90;
# A 3000 to 100,000-fold hike for exposure to iodine-131; and
# An almost 25,000 rise for exposure to radioactive nickel-63.i"

source: http://www.collapsenet.com/free-resources/collapsenet-public-access/item...

also:
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=24292

hope you guys have informed your family members!

Dr. Tom, are the best minds,

Dr. Tom, are the best minds, technology, machinery addressing Fukushima with as much manpower as possible? I feel like the world is mostly standing back while TEPCO goes about its usual knack for failure. Krista

Politely call or e-mail

television stations and newspapers and ask them.

The 24-hour news stations have a "contact us" list for e-mailing.

If enough people showed interest, they'd probably pick up on covering it again.

None of the major networks

None of the major networks are "independent". We have a monopoly media and all are corporate owned. This is very different than it was 30 years ago. Heavy lobbying resulted in our government allowing more and more monopolization of the media and a total failure to enforce our country's anti-trust laws. And some people still repeat the lie that the media is "liberal"... nothing could be further from the truth. The news is run more as entertainment to deliver eyeballs for advertisers and they certainly don't want to cover stories that might hurt their bottom line. It is so sad to see the state of television news these days. It is sheer propoganda. At least in the former soviet union people KNEW their news was propoganda. The sad thing here is that people have no clue. They believe the news. They believe that if something were a problem then of course it would be covered by the news. But it's just not the case. How else could we have had war for 9 years, let Wall Street crooks off without a single jail sentence, and have not a single word mentioned about radiation dangers. Because everything we know and believe is filtered through a corporate owned media. Those of us who actually seek out real information and real news are very very few.

American Media Failure

RIGHT ON!!! I needed to read this today. Your comment reminds me that I am not alone in this. I was feeling down especially about the state of the fourth estate. The Soviet style media system we live under today in the United States of America is dangerous and keeps me up at night. It's like living under a dam with no electricity.

The Invisible Risk

Maybe it is not being reported on because it doesn't exist, or is so small it pales when compared to other risks we accept in our daily lives. Of note, it often takes several days to get a result for High (bad) levels of bacteria, asbestos, PCB's and mercury, as well as other toxins, but you can walk around with a meter and get Instant indications of levels of radioactivity. Why people are so afraid of This (radioactivity) Toxin is beyond me. I'm not trying to imply that any additional radioactivity is good, but in the big picture, (outside of the immediately affected area in Japan) the levels simply do not justify scientific concern.

Cumulative radioactivity

Think cumulatively. Japan's officials first say they'll be working on sealing up the radioactive leaks for the next nine months, but came back a few days later saying they couldn't say for sure if they could do it in that timespan. Then somehow they must have gotten enlightening info as they say that it will be cleaned up by July. Maybe they meant 2012? How long will this go on? How many other incidents will it take to reduce the length and quality of our lives. I'm almost 60 years old and have lived most of my life already, so if I only live twenty more years that would be acceptable, but my kids are only in their twenties. For them and all the next generation to only get twenty more years then face painful sickness and possible poverty from being bilked by our medical system would be tragic. In that time we could get deadly sunflares or other natural disasters to create leaks and explosion and fires that send more of this toxic invisible stuff deep into our environment and shorten the lives of us all. If the American natives thought seven generations ahead, what would they be thinking now?

Many of us have been fighting it for decades trying to tell people we can do it differently by conservation and sustainable fuels. But oil interests have had the most resistance to it so it keeps the value up on their prize that keeps making them richer. No end to it in sight. Too much corruption and too many uneducated and disinterested people.
So much potential bottled up in distraction.

The sheeple get what they

The sheeple get what they deserve. The rest of us evacuated the USA long ago.

Virtually everything

Virtually everything justifies scientific concern, especially that which does harm to the lifeforms on this planet. The fallout from the Fukushima disaster falls firmly in the later category, as it is currently and will for many years to come do harm to humans (both inside and outside of Japan, including here in the United States) and other forms of life. Even if ZERO fallout blew over to the US, US citizens would be exposed to it due to the global supply chain.

In order to understand the risk posed by exposure to radionuclides, one must know exactly which radionuclides are present and in what quantities/forms and exactly where the concentrations are and how exposures will manifest themselves. Spot testing of just a few radionuclides and the disregarding of others is not adequate. Much of the actual exposures will occur well after the event due to the time it takes to grow crops on the contaminated soil and use those crop products in food stuffs. Thus there is a very significant amount of analysis that SHOULD be done by the scientific community. There are dozens of radionuclides that should be tested for and not tens or hundreds but THOUSANDS of samples that should be taken across the country and in very many places and of very many things. This has not been done. This is not being done. This will not be done. Not because it is unwarranted but because of fundamental shortcomings in our government, industry, scientific community, news media, and citizenry.

If one considers the threat from radionuclides (in general, or even in general plus those from Fukushima) to be minimal than I strongly encourage them to disregard the issue and if they so desire try to maximize their exposure in pursuit of the mythical hormesis effect. Those that recognize that there is a threat that is not receiving proper attention have hopefully taken appropriate steps and will recognize that those they have been programmed to turn to for information and help are in fact their greatest enemy.

Well isn't that the question

Well isn't that the question of the year if I ever heard it. Many of us have been trying to get attention to this issue.

So the question is why don't they want to bring attention to it. There is only one answer.

National Desk Rejected My Stories On Fukushima

I write for a national newswire and am based in Southern California. I wrote two stories a few weeks ago on Fukushima and submitted them for national distribution. They were turned down. One story was about Tepco's plans to build two nuclear plants in Texas (from Truth-Out.org, Greg Palast).

The other was about the high I-131 readings measured in rainwater a few weeks ago.

Stations all over the country use our service. I believe--firmly--that this story should not have been silenced so quickly. What's happening in Japan is tragic, and the people working in that toxic stew are heroes. They are literally risking or giving their lives for their countrymen, and if that's not patriotic, I don't know what is. Whatever it is, it's heroic and has meaning for us here.

My boss told me "our stations don't want to carry stuff like that." "Stuff like that" being news that is controversial or which contradicts what the mainstream news organizations are putting out. He questioned me about my "sources" and seemed to imply that my judgement might be suspect.

So the stories I write have been censored from within the organization, and there isn't a thing I can do about it.

Part of the problem is that, though many people here (on this forum) know that the cable channels and networks are owned by weapons-makers and nuclear interests, there isn't a general awareness of this in the public mind. People watch the TV news and that's what they deem credible. If the TV isn't covering it, if the radio isn't covering it, then it's probably not worth worrying about. In my 17 years in news radio, I've come to find that the Internet, some print journalism and books are the most reliable journalistic sources (depending, of course). Broadcast news suffers for personnel and so the reporters just do whatever public officials decide is a story, or they take their stories from print media. There's no manpower for investigative reporting, with the exception of NPR. The problem is that many, many people don't use the Internet, and don't know it can be trusted. They use TV and radio. And the cable channels refer to "blogs" and "Internet reports" with the kind of condescension that's guaranteed to convey to their audience that nothing on the Internet is trustworthy. Even though Propublica took the Pulitzer for national investigative reporting--an online publication--the Internet is regarded by far too many as unreliable for news.

I worked for many years at an NPR station and during that time we had the three cable news channels on in the control room (with the sound off) to monitor for breaking news. I got to see every day how those channels ignored stories that are extremely relevant, including the fact that high-ranking military personnel were dissenters of the Iraq war, including the questions that remain about 9/11, the deregulation of Wall Street, the list goes on and on.

What's really bothering me is that I find I don't have the words to explain to people how censored their news really is. I just don't know how. Including with my boss, who watches those channels and is probably mad at me for saying there's no news on them. There's a bit of news, to be sure. People watch them because there's just no other choice.

My understanding is that the airwaves are to be used--at least partially-- for the public good. This is no longer the case. It's not even a question of ratings. It's a question of what stories might hurt the ownership's interests. The person who posted GE's broadcast holdings makes a great point. Just follow the money, that's always where the answer seems to be..

In the meantime I have been discouraged and have submitted no stories on the nuclear situation. I write for Southern California and that's my beat. But the national desk still has the option to vet and distribute my stories--and they will not. And it's not some sneaky conspiracy. It's not because we're owned by nuclear interests (like MSNBC). The editors' ideas about credible news sources are based on what people already watch and nothing else. They are resistant to anything that seems to color outside the lines. They help the censors without even realizing what they're doing.

Japanese Ministry of Internal Affairs censoring "illegal info"

A French ex-pat living in Tokyo- and boy, is he pissed. His latest upload:

playbacklapompe

A new team has been created to control "rumors" which may be "harmful", in which case, they are also "illegal".

"The government charges that the damage caused by earthquakes and by the nuclear accident are being magnified by irresponsible rumors, and the government must take action for the sake of the public good. The project team has begun to send "letters of request" to such organizations as telephone companies, internet providers, cable television stations, and others, demanding that they "take adequate measures based on the guidelines in response to illegal information. "The measures include erasing any information from internet sites that the authorities deem harmful to public order and morality."

-emphasis added-

He reports 40 pCi/L of radiation in breast milk`

he says this is NOT on NHK but on local Japanese news

Very troubling amount which the government of Japan says is safe.

Very interesting, thanks for

Very interesting, thanks for sharing. Please feel free to contact me if you change your mind about writing on this. There may be other angles to work the information in to the national desks. What about NPR? Other than our local affiliate in which I gave an interview, I have not heard any of this in the national NPR beat.

FYI: we were contacted by

FYI: we were contacted by Fox News directly last week and we answered questions on our rain water readings. I don't think anything was aired, however. Fox and CNN, to me, are not really news but entertainment. Their decisions on what to air are based mainly on ratings. It is really too bad because information on traditional outlets have become monopolized. However, we have no one to blame but ourselves: whether it is going to Amazon (or Barnes&Noble) Books rather than the local book store, or Safeway, rather than the local food market or farmer's market, or we watch CNN/FOX rather than PBS or local news (in which we have been covered quite a lot), we "vote" for this monopolization. To me, this is why a free internet is so important and the continuing evolution of information vetting engines (informal and formal) that bring to the world a level of truth that has historically not been available to the masses. The vetting of information used to be done by responsible journalists and editors but I fear we, as a society, have undermined their authority, and rightly so. I have met some very honorable reporters and editors, but rarely are they qualified to report on highly complex (scientific) issues. As scientists, we need to prepare the next generation to communicate as well as perform research. This is as important as the science itself.

My sentiments exactly

I totally agree, Dr Chivers. This is a very important point you make.

Exceptionally well said. Forbes Blogger Jeff McMahon

Jeff is doing an exceptional job reporting on these complex issues on his Forbes Magazine Blog and he has called out UCBerkeley info in particular as very worthwhile ( a few of us from here post in the comments there where there is some lively deabte and some exceptional info)

http://blogs.forbes.com/jeffmcmahon/2011/04/14/why-does-fda-tolerate-mor...

check out his other blog entries on this subject: it rocks!

The reality is that people who are intelligent and who care are following this in the alternative media and are getting more and more informed.

But I have to say this forum has been one of the very best things on the internet in terms of access to data and information and intelligent analysis and debate.

I heartily agree that it is the internet which must be the primary source of news and as long as the folks at BRAWM are willing to tolerate all the abuse they take at times and the off the wall commenters etc, they will REMAIN as the go to site for info which will be invaluable to researchers, epidemiologists and the general public for as long as they keep this site going. Not only that but I believe it will encourage people to learn more and actually try to get into programs like this at UCBerkeley so that the tests the public needs done will get done (when the government either fails to do it or is unwilling to do it).

Thanks are due the BRAWM team for BEING the most reliable media most of us can find for hard data, if perhaps the only current and relevent data.

Reply to Exceptionally well said..

Here! Here!

agreed

It's ridiculous. I follow Guardian UK which is on top of it daily, but they don't talk about specific risk to N America.

The answer is likely because

The answer is likely because it is not a major issue, just like the BRAWM team has been saying over and over again.

This website has already heavily self-selected for people who are abnormally concerned. And I will be the first to acknowledge that I was abnormally concerned as well - probably due to the fact that I lived through Chernobyl in Eastern Europe.

However, ground yourself in reality. The actual total dose from this will be very small (for Americans) compared to annual dosages that everyone already receives.

Oh BS. You know thats BS.

Oh BS. You know thats BS.

Its because there is nothing we can do to stop it and they don't want everyone freaking out. So instead of telling us what we could have done to at least minimally protect ourselves, our families they assed us out period to avoid a "panic".

Also as a "courtesy" to Japan and the nuclear community.

More?

Since you've survived

Since you've survived Chernobyl, seeing the films and the research of the genetic and cancerous effects of Chernobyl on your fellow Eastern Europeans must truly be heartbreaking for you.

Now that Japan is rated a "7" the same as Chernobyl, I think it would be impossible not to regard the recent events in Japan if not a big deal, at least something to stay educated about, and therefore better able to take what precautions one can.

Especially since:

(1)there are those who strongly claim that there is no safe dose of radiation exposure;

(2) the dosage-to-health-effects ratio is based on a 1950's old model not taking DNA into account;

(3) and there is little research on low dose radiation exposure in humans.

If staying abreast of the situation means we're a little smarter and a little more aware to not drink milk, for example, when drinking milk was one of the main entry points leading to thryoid cancer in the children of Chernobyl, then I say we're extremely normal and all-the-more wiser.

And the United States got

And the United States got the highest dose of radiation from Japan according to this map of CTBTO air monitors:

http://db.eurad.uni-koeln.de/prognose/data/alert/ra_animation.gif

so your breathing is fine?

so your breathing is fine? Where are you located, if I may ask? On the eastcoast?

List

(Credit for this list goes to "informed" posted April 15 on enenews.com):

http://enenews.com/april-16-forecast-shows-radioactive-cloud-stretching-...

List of assets owned by General Electric
Primary business unitsGE Capital
GE Capital Aviation Services, GE Energy Financial Services, GE Real Estate, GE Americas, GE Asia and GE Europe, Middle East & Africa
GE Technology Infrastructure
GE Aviation, GE Healthcare and GE Transportation
GE Energy
GE Energy Services, GE Oil & Gas, GE Power & Water
GE Home & Business Solutions
GE Appliances & Lighting, GE Intelligent Platforms
NBC Universal (49% ownership)
[edit] HealthcareGE Healthcare
Amersham plc
Datex Ohmeda
Whatman
[edit] MediaNBCUniversal (49% ownership)
NBC – National Broadcasting Company
NBC Network Television stations
WNBC 4 – New York
KNBC 4 – Los Angeles
WMAQ 5 – Chicago
WCAU 10 – Philadelphia
KNTV 11 – San Jose/San Francisco
KXAS 5 – Dallas/Fort Worth²
WRC 4 – Washington
WTVJ 6 – Miami
KNSD 39 (cable 7) – San Diego²
WVIT 30 – Hartford
NBC Entertainment
NBC News
NBC Sports
NBC Studios
NBCUniversal Sports & Olympics
NBCUniversal Television Group
Universal Media Studios
NBC Universal Television Distribution
NBC Universal International Television
EMKA, Ltd.
NBC Universal Digital Media
NBC Universal Cable
A&E Television Networks (co-owned with The Hearst Corporation and Disney/ABC):
A&E
The Biography Channel
Crime & Investigation Network
The History Channel
The History Channel en Español
History Channel International
Lifetime
Military History Channel
Bravo
Chiller (horror-themed cable channel, launched March 1, 2007) [1]
CNBC
CNBC World
MSNBC (co-owned with Microsoft)
NBC WeatherPlus
mun2
SyFy
ShopNBC
Sleuth
USA Network
Universal HD
The Weather Channel
WeatherPlus
NBCUniversal Global Networks
NBCUniversal Global Networks
LAPTV (Latin America) – co-owned with Paramount Pictures (Viacom), MGM and 20th Century Fox (News Corporation);
Telecine (Brazil) – co-owned with Globosat Canais, Paramount Pictures, DreamWorks, MGM and 20th Century Fox;
Universal Channel Latin America (except Brazil
Universal Channel Brazil (co-owned with Globosat Canais);
Sci Fi Channel (Latin America)
NBCUniversal Global Networks España.
Telemundo
KVEA/KWHY – Los Angeles
WNJU – New York
WSCV – Miami
KTMD – Houston
WSNS – Chicago
KXTX – Dallas/Fort Worth
KVDA – San Antonio
KSTS – San Jose/San Francisco
KTAZ – Phoenix
KBLR – Las Vegas
KNSO – Fresno
KDEN – Longmont, Colorado
WNEU – Boston/Merrimack
KHRR – Tucson
WKAQ – Puerto Rico
Universal Studios (co-owned with Vivendi)
Universal Pictures
Focus Features
Rogue
Working Title Films
Universal Studios Licensing
Universal Animation Studios
Universal Interactive
Universal Pictures International
Universal Studios Home Entertainment
Universal Home Entertainment Productions
United International Pictures (co-owned with Paramount Pictures/Viacom);
Universal Operations Group
Universal Production Studios
Universal Parks & Resorts
qubo – Qubo Venture,LLC¹
¹Minority interest
²Stations which LIN Television owns a minority interest (24%) in

you have seen the movie 'wag

you have seen the movie 'wag the dog'? GE owns the media. it's bad business for them if people believe there is anything wrong with nuclear power. meh... thank goodness for the information age and the internet though. look for arnie gunderson and dr. helen caldicott. there is some reliable information online from reputable sources. just because it is or isnt on the 'news' doesnt mean its happening. we have been tv free for years~it is all propaganda anyways.

Lack of fallout date on national news/TV

I would like to second the puzzlement of the person who emailed about the lack of fallout news in the media. Is ANYONE OUT THERE??? Yoohoo...

This is a subject that is of concern to millions and millions and which effects millions and millions. After all, regardless of how much danger one assigns to the fallout that we are now being exposed to, we ARE being exposed to fallout. Hence, the milk, and water and air being tested. Yet, I see virtually nothing in the media. Ironically, Charlie Sheen, whose "half-life" of fame will decay faster that the cesium that is now in our soil, has been getting more coverage.

So, first, there is a primary story that needs to be told: The story of the fallout from this nuclear disaster as it impacts the USA and our food supply, and the continuing follow-up to the radiation levels. Then, there is a secondary story that is now begging to be told: WHY isn't there more coverage?

London Calling

I have been playing The Clash's "London Calling"and Men at Work's "It's a Mistake". This is scarier than an atomic bomb. An atomic bomb gives a warning.
This sucker is getting us silently. Now that early video of the mushroom cloud
over one of the reactors is the "Zapruder Film" of this thing. Watch it over and over. It appears that the RPV rocketed thousands of feet up and broke up and released fuel pellets and fell making a whistling noise as it fell.

Mainstream media silence is deafening! Here, physicist tells all

I know, the silence in mainstream media is deafening! The Internet and my own local observations are the most telling (ie:shelves overloaded with milk and dairy products with more frequent raids on non-dairy milk substitutes such as almond milk, seafood not selling and raids on frozen and canned foods!)

Sometimes thoughtful discussion occurs as in the example here with physicist Michio Kaku whose relatives have already evacuated from Tokyo by choice since they most certainly have received his professional evaluation of the reality of the situation. Radionuclide contamination has been found in Japan's tap water too so their leaving makes an indicting statement on the situation. If I knew how I would coordinate an airlift with willing families throughout the US to relocate the Japanese people most affected.

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/no-japans-nuclear-reactors-are-not-stable (once you get to the site, scroll down to see the actual interview on Democracy Now.)

No, Japan's Nuclear Reactors Are Not "Stable"
Submitted by George Washington on 04/13/2011 15:33 -0400

JapanMeltdownNuclear Power

The Japanese government and Tepco claim that the nuclear reactors are "stable" and that radiation releases have subsided to low levels.

But world renowned physicist Michio Kaku - who studied under atom bomb developer Edward Teller - told Democracy Now today:

Tokyo Electric has been in denial, trying to downplay the full impact of this nuclear accident. However, there’s a formula, a mathematical formula, by which you can determine what level this accident is. This accident has already released something on the order of 50,000 trillion becquerels of radiation. You do the math. That puts it right smack in the middle of a level 7 nuclear accident. Still, less than Chernobyl. However, radiation is continuing to leak out of the reactors. The situation is not stable at all. So, you’re looking at basically a ticking time bomb. It appears stable, but the slightest disturbance—a secondary earthquake, a pipe break, evacuation of the crew at Fukushima—could set off a full-scale meltdown at three nuclear power stations, far beyond what we saw at Chernobyl.

***

When the utility says that things are stable, it’s only stable in the sense that you’re dangling from a cliff hanging by your fingernails. And as the time goes by, each fingernail starts to crack. That’s the situation now.

***

TEPCO is like the little Dutch boy. All of a sudden we have cracks in the dike. You put a finger here, you put a finger there. And all of a sudden, new leaks start to occur, and they’re overwhelmed.

I suggest that they be removed from leadership entirely and be put as consultants. An international team of top physicists and engineers should take over

-Off my menu: All Seafood! Why? because the oceans have become the prime military and industrial sewer and the last thing I want is to inadvertently ingest enough nuclear material to invite some horrific terminal disease such as leukemia, lymphoma,lung,breast or other cancers known to be more common since 1946...