RADIOACTIVE FALLOUT FROM THE CHERNOBYL NUCLEAR REACTOR ACCIDENT data in CA

Can somebody check these

Can somebody check these numbers which claim that Chernobyl lead to an order of magnitude more fallout over CA than Fukushima?

orov

Tncrc arc several possible explanations for the concentration-time profile
measured in the Livermore area. Since the radioactivity release from the
Chernobyl-reactor site lasted for many days it is possible that part of the variation is
due to the release pattern, however, the radioactivity was detected for several weeks
after the last radioactive release so this is probably only a partia? explanation.
Another explanation is that the air mass containing the radioactive plume passed over
the western United States several times before the level of activity was below our
detection limits. Each time the air mass passed over our area more activity woufd be
detected, at successively lower concentrations due to continuous deposition and
radioactive decay. This would result in the pattern seen in Fig. 5. This explanation
has been proposed by others to explain similiar concentration patterns. It has also
been suggested that such an oscillatory pattern is normal for surface deposition from
a wide ranging plume. The variety of factors which affect the plume transport rate
can produce a striated concentration pattern within the plume. Then as the plume
7
passes over a given area the concentration-time profile of the deposited material will
have nn oscillatory pattern which will mimic the plume striations .

compare readings heres post chernoble data for CA

Table 1: RAQIONUCLIOES IN U. S. FDA SAMPLES
K-40* Ru-103 Te-132 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-136 Cs-137 Ba-140
Mushrooms
Portobello-1 — 123 123 153 — — — —
Portobello-2 3469 175 103 182 54 9 107 64
Brown-1 — — — — — — — —
Brown-2 3239 — 23 46 — — — —
Pleurotus-1 3630 339 269 1526 — — 305 —
Pleurotus-2 3553 425 267 1907 175 33 320 217
Be-7* Ru-103 Te-132 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-136 Cs-137 Ba-140
Endive
Outer/Inner 6465 1653 595 4419 633 104 1381 511

What's your point? Quoting

What's your point? Quoting the table without actually comparing to the post-Fukushima data? For readers info, you could at least say that this is table 1 of the paper in the above link.

Let's see, converting the data for wild mushrooms in these tables to Bq/kg I'm getting about 130 Bq/kg if I-131 activity for wild mushrooms, and 45 Bq/kg for Cs-137. The respective numbers from the nuclear engineering team here are 8.4 and 0.47 respectively. In other words if I didn't mess up the calculation (please somebody actually check it!!!) Chernobyl lead to 15 times higher I-131 and 100 times higher Cs-137 contamination in wild mushrooms than Fukushima.

That would be reassuring.

If your math is right, I

If your math is right, I think that's pretty scary. Why would the numbers be different by an order of magnitude or two?

Yes why hasn't someone

Yes why hasn't someone knowledgeable in all of this made a graph comparing the 2 disasters?

it would

just posting data so someone with phd could compare no genius here:)