Highly Recommended for BRAWN team

If you have not read this study/analysis from Clark University.

It is the most comprehensive overview of risk studies I have found yet.

It incorporates the results of many peer-reviewed studies in its body and tables etc..

It also discussses at length the interesting question of supralinear risk ratios and homeostasis and basically concludes that the linear model works best in general but that some cancers and illnesses fit better into the other models when you see the results (ie some cancers have higher incidence at lower rates of exposure while some risk may be lowered at the lowest rates of exposure then rise at higher exposures). There is another model which concaves high at low and high exposures but is more linear at moderate exposures.

There is a lot of info in this report on fetuses and even on exposure of sperm/ovaries preconception which shows an increase of risk if one is exposed to ionizing radiation shortly before conception occurs.

In any case, I offer this as material for the BRAWN team to consider as it is quite comprehensive and objective.

I also recommend others who are concerned take a look at it as it has an extensive section on studies of those who live downwind or near nuclear facilities in the US and elsewhere which have had leaks and/or routine emissions of radionuclides such as strontium 90.

I would love to know what the BRAWN team members think about this report and if they find it might be useful for others to get a better handle on the present disaster and future options for energy and health and survival as a species vis a vis nuclear energy.