Sea Water and Seafood

Thank you again for your excellent work and reporting.
I am hoping that you will test sea water especially now that such high levels of radioactive isotopes are being measured in the sea water off of Japan. I am concerned about radioactive contamination of seafood. Will you be testing sea water soon and who will be testing the seafood caught off the West Coast of the US and Canada?
Thank you.

China conducts second

China conducts second radiation monitor in Pacific Ocean

http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/202936/7691886.html

Edited and translated by People's Daily Online

A marine monitoring team dispatched by China’s State Oceanic Administration accomplished the mission of monitoring radiation in the western Pacific Ocean for the second time, and returned to Xiamen on Dec. 27 aboard the Xiangyanghong 09 scientific exploration ship.

The monitoring team sailed about 6,100 nautical miles in 30 days, and monitored radiation in the air over and water in the western Pacific Ocean as well as radiation-sensitive sea creatures, chemistry and dynamic environments.

This is the second time that China has monitored radiation in international waters in the western Pacific Ocean.

The aim of the mission is to gain a deeper understanding of the impact of Japan’s Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster on the western Pacific Ocean and China’s marine environment, and to help build a western Pacific marine environmental monitoring and early warning system.
1/3/11

IAEA to survey radioactive

IAEA to survey radioactive contamination in sea
The IAEA, the UN nuclear watchdog agency, is to survey the long-term effects of the spillage of radioactive water from the damaged Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power on the maritime environment in the Pacific Ocean.

The International Atomic Energy Agency made the decision at a regular meeting of board governors in Vienna on Tuesday.

Australia, South Korea and Indonesia will lead the survey on possible sea pollution in the Pacific Ocean and the East China Sea.

The survey will collect samples of radioactive substances in sea waters and will compare them with data collected before the nuclear accident in Fukushima.

The maritime survey will be conducted over 4 years, beginning in July.

http://www3.nhk.or.jp/daily/english/world.html

Miami herald

Scientific voyage to study Japanese nuclear impact on ocean
The scientists say the effects of radioactive contamination in ocean waters, sediments and fish is not well understood. The Japanese nuclear disaster is the worst release of radioactive materials into an ocean.

http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/06/03/2250001/scientific-voyage-to-study...

Radiation: Expedition samples Pacific Ocean/ very cool

http://www.global-adventures.us/2011/06/02/radiation-expedition-pacific/

Fukushima (global-adventures.us): A new 15-day scientific expedition aboard the University of Hawaii’s research vessel Kaimikai-O-Kanoloa will measure radioactive substances in the Pacific Ocean that leaked from the Fukushima nuclear power plant over the past months. The Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) will lead the first international, multidisciplinary assessment.
“This project will address fundamental questions about the impact of this release of radiation to the ocean, and in the process enhance international collaboration and sharing of scientific data,” said Vicki Chandler, Chief Program Officer, Science at the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation. “It is our hope that through this adverse event, we can increase our current knowledge about various natural and man-made sources of radioactivity in the ocean, and how they might ultimately impact ocean life and health around the world.”
The shipboard research team, which includes scientists from labs in the U.S., Japan, and Spain, will collect water and biological samples and take ocean current measurements in an area 120 by 120 miles (200 by 200 kilometers) offshore of the plant and further offshore along the Kuroshio Current. Their work will build on efforts by Japanese scientists and lay the foundation for expanded international collaboration and long-term research of questions related releases from the Fukushima plant.
The release of radioactivity from the partial meltdowns, hydrogen explosions and fires that began March 11 at the Fukushima plant and the runoff from the subsequent attempts to cool the reactors represents an unprecedented release of radiation to the ocean. The total amount of radioactivity that has entered the ocean as a result of this accident is not well understood, and until now, only limited assessment of the impacts on the ocean has been undertaken.
“It’s critical to gather early observations of the radioactive contaminants, or radio nuclides, in the water and marine biota so we can establish a baseline,” said chief scientist Ken Buesseler, a WHOI senior scientist and a recognized expert in the study of radioisotope geochemistry. “Together with measurements of ocean currents, we can begin to understand the potential near- and long-term severity of the releases and related public health issues.”
The Japanese government and Fukushima plant owner, Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO), began measuring iodine and cesium isotopes in the ocean 10 days after the accident and have been monitoring the water around the reactors up to 19 miles (30 kilometers) from shore, where radiation levels have been highest. As the radiation moves offshore, it is diluted and mixed through the ocean depths along the way, so that levels of some contaminants just 15 miles (24 kilometers) offshore are 100 to 1,000 times lower than waters near the reactors. To put it in context, even these elevated levels are not far removed from the US Environmental Protection Agency drinking?water standard for cesium-137 or from natural radionuclide concentrations found in the ocean.
Although the elevated levels offshore pose little direct hazard for human exposure, questions remain about the impact of long-lived isotopes that can accumulate in the food chain and remain present in sediment, emitting a persistent low-dose in the marine environment for years to come.
Operating with the permission of the Japanese government, the ship will follow a track line from east to west and operate at 34 sampling stations, criss-crossing the Kuroshio Current, a strong, western boundary current similar to the Gulf Stream in the Atlantic, that could rapidly carry the radioactivity into the interior of the ocean. Deploying water sampling rosettes, the team will collect and analyze the samples for many radio nuclides – among them isotopes of cesium, iodine, ruthenium promethium, strontium, plutonium, radium, and uranium – to learn how much contamination was released into the ocean, its potential impact on marine life and human health, and provide input to models for better understanding of contamination pathways and dispersion.
“It is important that we have in situ data on the trajectories of the water parcels,” says Steve Jayne, a physical oceanographer from WHOI and an expert in the Kuroshio Current and ocean circulation in the vicinity of the Japan archipelago. “There has been a lot of numerical modeling of the where the contaminated water is going, but very little real data to validate the models.  Satellite data is useful, but the surface drifters and other ocean data will provide ground truth to check the model predictions,” Jayne said.
In addition to bringing warm tropical waters north, the Kuroshio Current transports organisms’ long distances and is an important migration route for a variety of commercially important marine organisms in various stages of their life cycles.  Biological samples and measurements, among the first to be collected offshore, will be gathered using a variety of filters and nets in an effort led by Nick Fisher of the State University of New York at Stony Brook. Fisher’s team will focus on phytoplankton and zooplankton at the base of the food chain and juveniles and adults of key fish species to determine the extent to which radio nuclides are accumulated in these organisms.
“Currently, we do not know the extent to which some of these radio nuclides have been bio-accumulated and passed up local food chains,” said Fisher.  “This is obviously of interest, since the principal concern about the dispersal of radio nuclides in the ocean stems from the fact that they can potentially be toxic to marine organisms or even humans who consume seafood, and the potential for toxicity is dependent on the extent to which the radio nuclides are bio-concentrated in marine organisms.”
Sample analysis will be performed over several months, and the end product will be a set of concentration maps for many different radio nuclides obtained independently by several groups allowing for inter-comparison of analytical methods.
In addition to the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation-funded work, Buesseler is also conducting research funded by the National Science Foundation to analyze water samples from a network of stations where the ability to retrieve ocean water samples already exists.
“While early data will tell us about possible health impacts to humans and marine biota, follow-up work will be needed for years and decades to come before we are able to say with any certainty that we understand the fate of these radio nuclides in the ocean and the effect they have had on the marine environment,” said Buesseler. “These early field data will immediately increase our understanding of how radioactive pollutants travel through ocean currents in this region and will enable more effective response to events that might occur in the future.”
The map depicts the line the ship will follow, with white dots representing planned sampling stations.  The expedition covers an area 120 by 120 miles (200 by 200 kilometers) offshore of the plant and further offshore along the Kuroshio Current (shown in yellows and reds). Illustration: WHOI
You may also like:

Vancouver seaweed contaminated

Many of us use kelp for nutritional support against radiation and other toxic exposure. Sea vegetables should be tested, especially considering that seaweed in Vancouver was already found to be contaminated: http://enenews.com/vancouver-seaweed-almost-400-above-international-stan...