Will BRAWM be posting any further test results?

Salt substitutes are made from mined minerals so how could they possibly be contaminated by any air or waterborne materials from Fukushima?? The only evidence for an increase in the substitutes is clearly due to the methods and instruments used to measure radiation which, it is also clear, do not have any sort of common standard for measurement. Distances from samples, quality of the instruments, their ability to detect and discriminate between different particles, the differences in measuring a sample on a granite kitchen countertop as opposed to a laboratory bench, and a slew of other variables that have been mentioned lead to the laughable and deplorable measurements mentioned.
Consider also that the minerals themselves come from different sources and regions of the world. So how can it be reasonably expected for samples to give any sort of meaning when measured? It's like comparing the sand from Los Alamos to the sand at Coney Island for radiation. Where did the salt substitute with a 5X increase in radiation come from? Was it from the same sources or different?
There is no single standard for measuring radiation in foods. Until a standard is created you will get these extreme variations.

Bwahahahahah!

The Great Sea Salt coverup continues!

Diemos