Thousands of consumer products found to contain low levels of radiation

http://www.knoxnews.com/news/2009/jun/21/tainted-goods/

Thousands of everyday products and materials containing radioactive metals are surfacing across the United States and around the world.

Common kitchen cheese graters, reclining chairs, women's handbags and tableware manufactured with contaminated metals have been identified, some after having been in circulation for as long as a decade. So have fencing wire and fence posts, shovel blades, elevator buttons, airline parts and steel used in construction.

A Scripps Howard News Service investigation has found that - because of haphazard screening, an absence of oversight and substantial disincentives for businesses to report contamination - no one knows how many tainted goods are in circulation in the United States.

But thousands of consumer goods and millions of pounds of unfinished metal and its byproducts have been found to contain low levels of radioactivity, and experts think the true amount could be much higher, perhaps by a factor of 10.

Government records of cases of contamination, obtained through state and federal Freedom of Information Act requests, illustrate the problem.

In 2006 in Texas, for example, a recycling facility inadvertently created 500,000 pounds of radioactive steel byproducts after melting metal contaminated with cesium-137, according to U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission records. In Florida in 2001, another recycler unintentionally did the same, and wound up with 1.4 million pounds of radioactive material. And in 1998, 430,000 pounds of steel laced with cobalt-60 made it to the U.S. heartland from Brazil.

But an accounting of the magnitude of the problem is unknown because U.S. and state governments do not require scrap yards, recyclers and other businesses - a primary line of defense against rogue radiation - to screen metal goods and materials for radiation or report it when found. And no federal agency is responsible for oversight.

"Nobody's going to know - nobody - how much has been melted into consumer goods," said Ray Turner, an international expert on radiation with Fort Mitchell, Ky.-based River Metals Recycling. He has helped decontaminate seven metal-recycling facilities that unwittingly melted scrap containing radioactive isotopes.

"It's your worst nightmare," Turner said.

It is also one that has only barely begun to register as a potential threat to health and safety.

What is known now is that - despite the shared belief of officials in six state and federal agencies that tainted metal is potentially dangerous, should be prevented from coming in unnecessary contact with people and the environment, and should be barred from entering the United States - there is no one in charge of making sure that happens.

In fact, the Scripps investigation found:

n Reports are mounting that manufacturers and dealers from China, India, former Soviet-bloc nations and some African countries are exporting contaminated material and goods, taking advantage of the fact that the United States has no regulations specifying what level of radioactive contamination is too much in raw materials and finished goods.

Compounding the problem is the inability of U.S. agents to fully screen every one of the 24 million cargo containers arriving in the United States each year.

n U.S. metal recyclers and scrap yards are not required by any state or federal law to check for radiation in the castoff material they collect or report it when they find some

n No federal agency is responsible for determining how much tainted material exists in how many consumer and other goods. No one is in charge of reporting, tracking or analyzing cases once they occur. In fact, the recent discovery of a radioactive cheese grater triggered a bureaucratic game of hot potato, with no agency taking responsibility.

n It can be far cheaper and easier for a facility stuck with "hot" items to sell them to an unwitting manufacturer or dump them surreptitiously than to pay for proper disposal and cleaning, which can cost a plant as much as $50 million.

n For facilities in 36 states that want to do the right thing, there is nowhere they can legally dump the contaminated stuff since the shutdown last year of a site in South Carolina, the only U.S. facility available to them for the disposal.

n A U.S. government program to collect the worst of the castoff radioactive items has a two-year waiting list and a 9,000-item backlog - and is fielding requests to collect an additional 2,000 newly detected items a year.

A potential long-term threat

Experts say you needn't empty your home of metal implements for fear of radiation. The peril from most individual items is generally not considered great, although some could be hazardous on their own.

In fact, everyone is exposed every day to the "background" radiation found in nature. For instance, some ceramic pots emanate low levels of radiation that occurs in clay. Granite countertops often contain measurable, but individually insignificant, amounts of naturally occurring uranium.

Other exposures come from small and contained amounts of radioactivity used in smoke detectors and medical devices.

The potential danger comes, however, from the cumulative effect of proximity to radiation, particularly over time and in relation to other contaminants. The precise degree of that danger has not yet been definitively determined for low-level radiation, such as that contained in commonplace goods and materials.

One scientific school of thought, which has been losing favor in recent years, holds that low levels of radiation mean low-level threats. An opposite camp contends that exposure to any level of radiation - especially if it is chronic - carries health risks. The U.S. government has so far sidestepped the issue of how little radiation is too much.

According to a 2006 report by a National Academy of Sciences panel, there is a direct relationship between radiation and an increased risk of cancer. Prolonged exposure can also lead to birth defects and cataracts, studies have shown.

Because the amount of tainted metals in circulation is unknown, the cumulative overall health effect - now and over time - is impossible to calculate. Whatever it is, there is little debate that unnecessary exposure to radiation is best avoided.

"There is no threshold of exposure below which low levels of ionizing radiation can be demonstrated to be harmless or beneficial," said Richard Monson, chairman of the Committee to Assess Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation, at the release of the National Academy report.

There are no reports of anyone dying or being hurt in the United States after contact with the contaminated metal goods and materials. But the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency leaves no doubt that tainted metal poses a particular threat.

"Radioactively contaminated scrap threatens both human health and the environment," reads a cautionary statement on the EPA's Web site.

Tainted graters, recliners

The Scripps investigation used the federal Freedom of Information Act to gain access to a previously un-mined NRC database, the only official assemblage of reports of radiologically contaminated items that have turned up in scrap yards, trash dumps and manufactured goods since 1990.

But because such reporting is neither required nor consistent, neither state nor federal environmental officials - nor many in the scrap-metal industry - consider the NRC accounts an accurate reflection of the problem's true dimensions. (The only mandatory rule is that anyone knowingly transporting radioactive material must notify the U.S. Department of Transportation.)

"Typically, these go unreported," said Carolyn Mac Kenzie, a U.S. Department of Energy physicist who is a world expert in radioactive metals. "Whatever number you come up with would not reflect reality."

One of the most conservative estimates comes from the U.S. Government Accountability Office, which put the number of radioactively contaminated metal objects unaccounted for in the United States in 2005 at 500,000. Others suggest the amount is far higher. The most recent NRC estimate - made a decade ago - is 20 million pounds of contaminated waste.

What is known is that the NRC's national Nuclear Material Events Database has documented 18,740 cases involving radioactive material in consumer products, metal intended for their manufacture and other inadvertent exposures to the public, the vast majority since 1990. State environmental reports - obtained under state freedom of information requests - also reveal dozens of others.

A recent example emerged last summer, when a Flint, Mich., scrap plant discovered a beat-up kitchen cheese grater that was radioactive. The China-made grater bearing the well-known EKCO brand name was laced with the isotope cobalt-60. Tests showed the gadget to be giving off the equivalent of a chest X-ray over 36 hours of use, according to NRC documents.

Estimated to have been in circulation for as long as a decade, the grater likely was four to five times more radioactive when it was new. EKCO's parent company, World Kitchen, of Rosemont, Ill., described the incident as isolated and found no need to issue a recall, spokesman Bryan Glancy said.

It was not the only cheese grater found. NRC documents show that another cobalt-60-tainted grater had turned up in Jacksonville, Fla., in 2006. The reports do not indicate what brand of grater it was or if it was related to the one that surfaced in Michigan.

cobalt-60 also tainted a 430,000-pound shipment of metal from Brazil in 1998. Part of that load found its way to Michigan and then Indiana, where it was used to make brackets for 1,000 La-Z-Boy recliners.

The contamination was detected by a radiation monitor when scrap leftover from the brackets job was shipped to the Butler, Ind., steel recycler Steel Dynamics, according to NRC documents.

The cobalt-60 tainted Reclina-Rocker chairs, which would have given off a chest X-ray's worth of radiation every 1,000 hours, were still in warehouses when the contamination was discovered, and never made it to stores or living rooms, according to Rex Bowser, director of the Indoor Air and Radiological Health Emergency Response Program of the Indiana State Department of Health.

The recliners' radiation levels were "enough above background to be a concern for people sitting in La-Z-Boy chairs," Bowser said.

Hot scrap

In many instances where contamination is identified - generally by companies that have invested in costly detection equipment -- the contamination comes from the inadvertent blending of radioactive sources with piles of other scrap that metal recyclers reprocess and later sell.

Often, when a factory shuts down or a plant relocates, industrial smoke detectors, measuring gauges and other machines and parts that contain small amounts of radioactive material are left behind. Because they commonly are encased in a protective shell, the devices pose little risk when the plant is operating.

But when a facility closes, the devices frequently are trashed as scrap. If those radioactive parts are later heated during reprocessing, the radioactivity can escape and blend with the finished recycled product.

Many large scrap outfits invest in radiation detectors - which can cost $50,000 each - that provide a measure of protection. Steel company Gerdau Ameristeel, based in Toronto and Tampa, Fla., installs as many as six levels of detection at its scrap mills, at a cost of as much as $1 million for each facility, said Jim Turner, corporate environmental director.

But even scrap and recycling operations that are diligent in scanning incoming and outgoing loads can unknowingly wind up with tainted material.

One reason is that monitoring devices are not all strong enough to penetrate a full truckload of scrap and may miss the radioactive sources. And even the weather can foul things up, as Gerdau Ameristeel learned when a 2001 thunderstorm disturbed detectors at its Jacksonville, Fla., recycling operation, permitting radioactive cesium-137 to slip through. The plant's cleanup cost was $10 million, according to an NRC report.

Sometimes the devices containing radiation simply disappear. In January, for instance, Walmart admitted that it could not account for about 15,000 illuminated exit signs, which each contain tritium, a radioactive isotope, according to the NRC.

And other times, they are purposely masked in an attempt to dump the hot items on someone else, often to avoid the cost of proper disposal. Those fees have mushroomed in the past three decades from $1 per cubic foot to more than $400, with forecasts for them to more than double in coming years, according to a 2004 estimate by Robin Nazzaro, the audit agency GAO's natural-resources and environment director.

Global sources

The global dimension of the recycling of radiation problem is large, and growing, experts say.

Between 2006 and 2007, for instance, authorities in the Netherlands found about 900 women's handbags that had originated in India and were decorated with metal rings laced with cobalt-60 on each bag's shoulder strap. Once discovered, they were sent to a radioactive waste site in the Netherlands.

Last fall, radioactive metal also from India was used by a Connecticut company to make 500 sets of buttons for Otis elevators in France and Sweden. No one realized the elevator buttons - which had been installed - were radioactive until a similar shipment tripped radiation alarms at the U.S. border with Mexico, according to Otis Elevator spokesman Dilip Rangnekar.

Otis scrambled to remove the tainted buttons from the elevator cabs, Rangnekar said. But an international authority on rogue radiation said it is likely even more of the buttons remain in circulation.

"Thousands and thousands were produced," said Abel Gonzalez, a former director of the International Atomic Energy Agency's division of radiation and waste safety. "I doubt they have found all of them."

U.S. officials and metal experts say evidence is mounting that radioactive metal from abroad is increasingly - and intentionally - being sent to the United States, sometimes decades after the contaminated material was first detected and returned to its source.

In 1991, an Indian supplier sent to the United States more than 50 shipments of chain-link fencing, some of which was tainted. Investigators found the fencing scattered around the country, including in Tennessee, Florida, New York and Washington state.

"The NRC told them not to ship more material to the U.S., but it allowed them to keep what was here, here," said Paul Frame, a radiation expert at the Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education in Oak Ridge.

But a decade later, another shipment of tainted Indian fencing reached the United States, Frame said.

"My guess was that it was the same stuff," he said. "You suspect that in some cases they know the material is radioactive but they're going to ship it out anyway because it's money."

John Williamson, administrator of Florida's radiation control bureau, agrees and predicts that tainted steel from China and products from India will continue to surface, at the borders and on the plant floors.

One reason is that, after U.S. customs rejects a load of contaminated material, no one knows what happens once it is sent back to its overseas producer because no tracking system exists, he and other front-line experts said.

"In China and India, who knows what happens?" Williamson said. "My belief is it goes back into the hopper."

Isaac Wolf can be reached at wolfi@shns.com.

Radioactive consumer products

If you want to know the most radioactive consumer products, it's not those that are mostly metals like flatware and the like. The public is mostly familiar with one of the most radioactive consumer products, but not the other. I'll start with the less familiar one.

One of the most radioactive consumer items found in the home is the SLR type camera. The reason is that 50 mm hunk of glass found on the front. Optical quality glass contains thorium, which is radioactive. So if you have an SLR type camera in your home, it is typically the most radioactive item in you home due to that 50 mm hunk of glass on the front.

The other item that the public is more familiar with, is the typical smoke detector. These smoke detectors are of the "ionization" type. They have a radioactive source in them, typically Americium, which produces a steady stream of alpha particles that the smoke detector looks for. When you have a fire, it also produces ions that will impede the alphas produced by the Americium. When the detector and electronics in the smoke detector see a drop in the detection rate of the alphas, then they know that ions from a fire are impeding the alphas, and the detector sounds the alarm.

There have been cases where medical equipment with radioactive sources have been improperly disposed of, usually in other countries; and radioactive material has found its way into metal scrap stream. Luckily, it has actually been the nuclear labs, nuclear power plants, and the nuclear industry that have caught the problem before it was more widespread.

Nuclear facilities have detectors to monitor the traffic and trucks going out of the facility in order to forestall radioactive material leaving the facility. However, those same detectors will also detect radioactivity in trucks coming INTO the facility. That's how this radioactive scrap has been discovered. There have been trucks stopped at Los Alamos National Laboratory, and at nuclear power plants because they were detected as being radioactive when the trucks were ENTERING the nuclear facility.

So the nuclear industry hasn't been the cause; but has helped mitigate the problem.

This is not contamination ... for the most part it is healthy

Low level radiation has been found to be quite harmless and it is important to have this radiation in the environment to boost health. McMaster University in Canada is investigating the health improving effects of low level radiation.

Our fear that low level contamination is dangerous stems from Cold War Propaganda, especially the propaganda created by Herman Muller who lied about low level radiation and its effect on fruit flies to stop the proliferation of nucear weapons. However he did a great dis-service to the world medical community.

The story is contained in the following website which will open a few eyes and remove much fear. Low level radiation has been used for about 3000 years in both Europe and Asia where radioactive hot springs remain as the ideal treatment for arthritis in Germany, Austria, Czech Republic, the Ukraines, Greece, France, Holland, Poland, China, Japan and Russia. All these countries embrace low level radiation for the treatment of certain diseases. You can read the history of low level radiation in maintaining health on this site ... http://radiation-hormesis.com

There are beaches in India which are 200 times more radioactive than most cities and yet the population enjoys a reduction in the incidence of cancer (30% lower), lower genetic mutations (20%) and better resistance to infectious diseases. There are two beaches in South America and they have the exact same statistics.

The above website is complete with science links to the lastest research and also has an episode of the Canadian Broadcasting Corp. show Quirks and Quarks from 2005 when the issue of Radiation Hormesis as well as chemical hormesis are discussed on the show.

I think the above article is scare mongering based on the false beliefs that happened in the Cold war.

Please research this carefully and do not scare people.

Ian Soutar

Oh Gawd another purple KoolAid Drinker

Go for it!

You suicidal maniac

And play Russian Roulette, Smoke like a Chimney, and enjoy High-Risk sexual behavior on your spare time. Your personal risky behavior is of ZERO consequence to the rest of us.

ALARA - (As Low As Reasonably Achievable}, is an appropriate Public Policy.

Avoidable, ARS (Acute Radiation Syndrome), Organ Failure, Leukemia, compromised Immune System, and Tumors do not appeal to Rational Human Beings.

But we won't lift a finger to STOP You!

Enjoy!

avoid the emotional reaction ... look first at the research.

Your reaction is obviously and quite totally emotional without even a touch of science awareness. It would do you good to try for some education rather than simply jumping to an emotional reaction. I do not believe that low level research is dangerous ... the evidence in population studies is simply lacking. One example ... the state of Colorado is the most radioactive state with the highest levels of radon in basements. Yet Colorado also has the lowest levels of lung cancer!

Look around in the USA ... the story is the same. People are simply not dropping life flies from radiation. Some in higher radiation states are actually healthier than the norm!

Ian Soutar
Vancouver Island.

Horrible

Thank you for opening my eyes to this situation.

I wonder about some items here in the house. I guess the corporations view it like this.

Why pay someone to properly dispose of radioactive materials? It is very costly.

Better to sink the materials right into household items, and even consumption. This way the materials are stored away somewhere (like in your kitchen or an elevator) and the corporation has actually made a profit.

Shame, and sick minded folk.

I ask myself who is worse the Colorado student shooting at the theater, outright violence. Or the calculating nuclear industry sneaking that crap into the market place and right into your home or stomach even and making a profit from it as well.

Not the nuclear industry....


I ask myself who is worse the Colorado student shooting at the theater, outright violence. Or the calculating nuclear industry ..

When these cases have arisen, it hasn't been the nuclear industry that is the source. The nuclear industry is very well regulated with monitoring at every step of the way.

No - the main source of this contamination have been from hospitals in countries other than the USA.

In fact, the reason many of these have been detected is because of nuclear facilities. For example, a load of radioactive metal due to an improperly disposed radiation treatment machine in Mexico, was only detected when the truck passed through the detectors at a nuclear facility. The detectors were there to detect radioactivity leaving the facility; and they picked up radioactivity coming into the facility via a truck that picked up scrap metal. That truck had already picked up the radioactive metal.

So get off your arrogant "high horse" and wrongly pointing fingers at the "nuclear industry". The nuclear industry are the ones the found this.