Request for BRAWM's Opinion re: Japan's Handling of Nuclear Waste & Radioactive Levels

Submitted by Anonymous on Tue, 2012-01-03 12:59

BRAWM Members: Do you support/agree with Japan's dumping of radioactive waste into the ocean (Tokyo Bay), as a way to get rid of the nuclear waste from their 3 failed GE Mark 1 nuclear reactors?
BRAWM Members: Is Japan's increased personal allowable levels of radioactive exposure a reasonable way to deal with increased radioactive levels?
BRAWM Members: Is Japan's approach to their 3 failed GE Mark 1 nuclear reactors the same approach that we should expect here if/when one or more of America's 23 GE Mark 1 nuclear reactors fails?
http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/comment/reply/6127

‹ Farnsworth IF ›

Can't touch this one!

Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 2013-01-04 18:56.

BRAWM won't touch this question with a ten foot pole IMO.

bump

Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 2012-01-06 21:07.

bump

bump

Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 2012-01-06 21:06.

bump

Other Hostile Questions

Submitted by Anonymous on Fri, 2013-01-04 19:08.

Do you still beat your wife?

Oh, are you the thieving nephew?

Have you quit having sex with animals?

---------------

There are no acceptable answers to your questions, so BRAWM cannot and will not answer.

But, the answer to your final question is YES. Yes this is what the future holds for nuclear disasters in the USA. More than that; the USA has a long HISTORY of the same methods.

So even your final question represents an unwarranted optimism.