Radioactive Bluefin Tuna Caught Off Coast Of San Diego
Tests Show Tuna Contained Levels Of Radioactive Substances
UPDATED: 12:06 pm PDT May 28, 2012
SAN DIEGO -- Across the vast Pacific, the mighty bluefin tuna carried radioactive contamination that leaked from Japan's crippled nuclear plant to the shores of the United States 6,000 miles away -- the first time a huge migrating fish has been shown to carry radioactivity such a distance.
"We were frankly kind of startled," said Nicholas Fisher, one of the researchers reporting the findings online Monday in the Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences.
The levels of radioactive cesium were 10 times higher than the amount measured in tuna off the California coast in previous years. But even so, that's still far below safe-to-eat limits set by the U.S. and Japanese governments.
Previously, smaller fish and plankton were found with elevated levels of radiation in Japanese waters after a magnitude-9 earthquake in March 2011 triggered a tsunami that badly damaged the Fukushima Dai-ichi reactors.
But scientists did not expect the nuclear fallout to linger in huge fish that sail the world because such fish can metabolize and shed radioactive substances.
One of the largest and speediest fish, Pacific bluefin tuna can grow to 10 feet and weigh more than 1,000 pounds. They spawn off the Japan coast and swim east at breakneck speed to school in waters off California and the tip of Baja California, Mexico.
Five months after the Fukushima disaster, Fisher of Stony Brook University in New York and a team decided to test Pacific bluefin that were caught off the coast of San Diego. To their surprise, tissue samples from all 15 tuna captured contained levels of two radioactive substances -- ceisum-134 and cesium-137 -- that were higher than in previous catches.
To rule out the possibility that the radiation was carried by ocean currents or deposited in the sea through the atmosphere, the team also analyzed yellowfin tuna, found in the eastern Pacific, and bluefin that migrated to Southern California before the nuclear crisis. They found no trace of cesium-134 and only background levels of cesium-137 left over from nuclear weapons testing in the 1960s.
The results "are unequivocal. Fukushima was the source," said Ken Buesseler of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, who had no role in the research.
Bluefin tuna absorbed radioactive cesium from swimming in contaminated waters and feeding on contaminated prey such as krill and squid, the scientists said. As the predators made the journey east, they shed some of the radiation through metabolism and as they grew larger. Even so, they weren't able to completely flush out all the contamination from their system.
"That's a big ocean. To swim across it and still retain these radionuclides is pretty amazing," Fisher said.
Pacific bluefin tuna are prized in Japan where a thin slice of the tender red meat prepared as sushi can fetch $24 per piece at top Tokyo restaurants. Japanese consume 80 percent of the world's Pacific and Atlantic bluefin tuna.
The real test of how radioactivity affects tuna populations comes this summer when researchers planned to repeat the study with a larger number of samples. Bluefin tuna that journeyed last year were exposed to radiation for about a month. The upcoming travelers have been swimming in radioactive waters for a longer period. How this will affect concentrations of contamination remains to be seen.
Now that scientists know that bluefin tuna can transport radiation, they also want to track the movements of other migratory species including sea turtles, sharks and seabirds.


You need to think positively about this
Think positively. Now the cans of tuna you by will be self preserving from the radiation and there will be no need for ordinary chemical preservatives. And with a shelf life in the thousands of years those cans of Chicken of the Sea will become family heirlooms. Imagine children a thousand years from now looking at those cans on the shelf and saying my great great (x50) grandfather bought them.
Certainly there are other obvious benefits as well. Overfishing will be a thing of the past because people will stop eating fish so fish levels will return to the way it was before commerical fishing began- albeit the fish will be deformed and diseased. Groups that chase whale hunters will be able to turn their attentions to other causes! Medical schools will experience a rapid increase in students as they work to fill the need for medical personnel to treat humanity. There are so many positives, so why dwell on the negative?
Add some mercury to that and voila !
Lets not forget how much mercury is also in the tuna.
This combination of radiation, and mercury might curb your appetite for tuna.
Think even after your tumors are cut out, you have a miscarriage, and you are dead and buried you will still have those decays going on.
Dearie, do you remember this nostalgic tuna recall?
Yes, it was not all that long ago that a nationwide recall of tuna back scrape was blamed on something called Salmonella Bareilly. See
http://www.foodsafetynews.com/2012/04/whats-the-deal-with-tuna-scrape/
U.S. Physician on Fukushima: Beware of all the lifeforms you tak
U.S. Physician on Fukushima: Beware of all the lifeforms you take out of the Pacific
http://enenews.com/physician-beware-of-all-the-lifeforms-you-take-out-of...
“Truly Frightening”: Higher and higher radioactivity levels expe
“Truly Frightening”: Higher and higher radioactivity levels expected to continue for years in bluefin tuna
http://enenews.com/frightening-every-bluefin-tuna-high-levels-cesium-hig...
These fish were caught 6 months ago! And the dumping
of tons of radioactive water into the Pacific every day has continued without letup and it will continue for years! Add in the dumping of the ashes that are being created from burning the debris of the tsunami. That means the amounts of radioactive materials collecting in the food chain are increasing every day! Think what the contamination levels will be in a year and in 2 years!
The Pacific is dying as a food source and as an ecosystem right before our eyes! And it is irreversible! The gift to mankind of nuclear energy!
BALONEY!!
The radioactive material is decaying. The reactors are no longer in operation, so they aren't making any new radioactive material. The Iodine-131 mentioned in the article has all decayed to Xenon-131; a harmless inert gas.
There's still the Cesium-137, but if you look at the amounts, the concentrations are small. In fact, BRAWM hasn't detected any Iodine-131 in over a year, and they haven't detected any increases in Cesium-137 in over a year.
The amounts discharged by Fukushima are orders of magnitude less than the radioactivity that Mother Nature puts in our food naturally.
The Pacific isn't dying. That's just the propaganda from the stupid little pinhead anti-nukes that have been besmirching this forum since the beginning.
Sorry Charlie
"The Iodine-131 mentioned in the article has all decayed to Xenon-131; a harmless inert gas."
"In fact, BRAWM hasn't detected any Iodine-131 in over a year."
The OP never mentioned I-131, the post is about very low level ceisum-134 and cesium-137 in Eastern Pacific Bluefin Tuna.
Forum etiquette reminder
Please DO NOT:
Call other people names
Use obscene language (your post will be blocked or deleted)
Post the exact same content multiple times (this may also get blocked anyway)
Please DO:
Be polite, civil, and respectful of different views
Provide links and references for facts you are using in your arguments
Stay on the topic of the thread, or start a new thread if your comment is off-topic
Thanks for the post. Read
Thanks for the post.
Read further on this, looks to be around 4bq/kg Cs-134 and around 6bq/kg Cs-137. This was from fish caught last August. Levels this year could be quite different in either direction +/-... and yes, Wood's Hole is going to test again. Hopefully they will make results available sooner rather than later. And damn it, I really want to see what Alaskan salmon and halibut look like...this will probably be self funded.
Advance copy of paper, kinda hard to read, link via safecast mailing list:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/18romZOx1D8dVj_Ib5exDfGl0t9bj-4yJcCWp...
BTW, there were background levels of "old" Cs-137 to compare against, so your chicken of the sea has had a little pop to it since the 50's...
BC 5/28/12
Found this hp post well written report among much fluff. salmon?
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/harriet-sugarmiller/radiation-pacific-fish_...
"Buck and Upton warned us. They're the two U.S. scientists who told the U.S. government early this year that there might be a problem with some migratory fish. Possible culprits: your salmon and tuna.
How correct were they? How will history's largest accidental deposit of radiation in the ocean affect our Pacific fish?"
http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/harriet-sugarmiller/radiation-pacific-fish_...
---------------------------------
the major media outlets have picked up this tuna report/study .the big fact they leave out is this "accident" at Fukushima was the biggest radioactive release into sea in mans history. two other study's *woods hole sampling the pacific and the *pacific kelp study to me indicate a much larger dispersion problem than a couple hot tuna migrating from Japan's coast...tdm
http://www.whoi.edu/page.do?pid=7545&tid=3622&cid=133509
"In addition to their own samples, the group also collected water that they later shipped to labs at seven other institutions. Together, the ongoing effort is examining 15 different radionuclides likely to have been released from Fukushima. Their initial results, detailed in the PNAS paper indicate that the combined amount of radioactive material from the damaged power plant constitutes the largest accidental release of radiation to the ocean in history."
http://www.whoi.edu/page.do?pid=7545&tid=3622&cid=133509
-----------
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/es203598r?prevSearch=Kelp&searchHis...
"The Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant, damaged by an earthquake and tsunami on March 11, 2011 released large amounts of 131I into the atmosphere, which was assimilated into canopy blades of Macrocystis pyrifera sampled from coastal California. The specific activity calculated to the estimated date of deposition/assimilation ranged from 0.6 to 2.5 Bq gdwt–1, levels greater than those measured from kelps from Japan and Canada prior to the release. These 131I levels represent a significant input into the kelp forest ecosystem. Canopy-forming kelps are a natural coastal dosimeter that can measure the exposure of the coastal environment to 131I and perhaps other radioisotopes released from nuclear accidents. An organizational mechanism should be in place to ensure that they are sampled immediately and continuously after such releases."
BC
To poster BC:
Thanks for all your comments, solid content information. I always read what you have to say.
You are welcome. I have tried
You are welcome. I have tried hard to understand a thing that is hard to.
BC 5/30/12
Yes, the pre-Fukushima
Yes, the pre-Fukushima background for Cesium 137 (no Cesium 134 detected), taken from samples in 2008 was an average of 1 bq/kg. The paper's authors say they deducted this (anthropomorphic, not natural) background from the Cesium 137 detection (so it is not included in the 6bq/kg reported). Therefore, these fish spent one month in western Pacific highly contaminated waters off the coast of Japan (April, 2011), before migrating, and despite significant dilution due to maturation/grown and metabolism, that exposure led to a ten-fold increase in Cs134/Cs137 contamination levels in each and every fish sampled here in California in August, 2011. Wow.
Incidentally, this is a really thorough paper with all sources and correlating and significant ancillary data disclosed. Kudos to the authors, and take a look via BC's link, above.
MM
Radioactive tuna may raise cancer risks: nuclear professor
Radioactive tuna may raise cancer risks: nuclear professor
A nuclear lecturer says the low levels of radioactivity found in tuna caught near San Diego can produce a small increase in cancer risks.
Daniel Hirsch, lecturer on nuclear policy at the University of California, is concerned about the radioactive tuna caught in August last year that reportedly swam from Japan.
Unlike some other compounds, radioactive cesium does not quickly sink to the sea bottom but remains dispersed in the water. Fishes can swim right through it, ingesting it through their gills.
*********************
I love how the first, and the general, response to the news about the tuna was it will not harm you.
But now scientists are starting to say things like it may cause a small increase in cancer and even one scientist saying not to eat them at all!
Also I have to wonder if tuna has absorbed this amount so far what will these fish contain in, say 2 more years, since Fukushima is still leaking into the ocean?
Hirsch is a lecturer in the Social Sciences at UC Santa Cruz
http://socialsciences.ucsc.edu/academics/faculty-directory.php
Not a nuclear scientist.
Daniel Hirsch of UCSD in NOT a nuclear professor or nuclear scientist.
He happens to be a lecturer in anthropology at UCSD. He also happens to have anti-nuclear views and is a member and speaker for the anti-nuclear group "Committee to Bridge the Gap".
So don't attempt to sell this forum some crap that this guy is some "nuclear expert". He's not a "nuclear expert"; he's an anthropologist.
Listen to what the real nuclear experts are saying; like BRAWM and UC - Berkeley Nuclear Engineering Dept. chairman Prof. Per Peterson.
Those are nuclear experts; not some anthropologist.