More from the Enviroreporter guy..

Here's some "good science" from someone who probably knows better by now but is much more concerned about BSing people into buying into his worldview.

http://www.enviroreporter.com/2011/12/radon-progeny-risk-december-15-2011/

This is 200%+ garbage. Why wouldn't he restest that rainfall a day or two later? Answer is he has... and it makes for bad internet. There is nothing there after the radon daughters decay away.

I am near totally anti-nuke, but anyone under the spell of this liar best wake up to his game. I knew it from the first time I saw something about 80+ CPM peaches or some garbage like that.

Watch people's methods and motives, be they pro, anti, or amateur.