Leukemias among Chornobyl Cleanup Workers
Radiation and the Risk of Chronic Lymphocytic and Other Leukemias among Chornobyl Cleanup Workers
http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ehp.1204996.pdf
Lydia B. Zablotska, Dimitry Bazyka, Jay H. Lubin, Nataliya Gudzenko, Mark P. Little, Maureen Hatch, Stuart Finch, Irina Dyagil, Robert F. Reiss, Vadim V. Chumak, Andre Bouville, Vladimir Drozdovitch, Victor P. Kryuchkov, Ivan Golovanov, Elena Bakhanova, Nataliya Babkina, Tatiana Lubarets, Volodymyr Bebeshko, Anatoly Romanenko, Kiyohiko Mabuchi
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1204996
Online 8 November 2012 ehponline.org
http://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/ehp.1204996.s001.pdf
Supplemental Material
1 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
2 National Research Center for Radiation Medicine, Kyiv, Ukraine
3 Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutesof Health, Department of Health and Human Services, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
4 Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden, New Jersey, USA
5 Departments of Pathology and Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
6 Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Centre, Moscow, Russia


Congratulations!
Kudos to Team Pro-Nuke, for effectively killing this news story.
Gone … unless you know precisely where to look.
Even the earlier scant news coverage has vanished, from the world press.
It did not happen.
Another job well done.
Even with all that....
Even with all that..the harm caused by Chernobyl in terms of death and disease is still less than that of a single airliner crash.
We have far more airliner crashes than nuclear accidents; and the damage toll due to airliner crashes is greater than that due to nuclear accidents.
However, is there a devoted cadre of pinheads that want to ban airliners? NOPE.
Is there a devoted cadre of pinheads that want to ban nuclear power?
YES - we see a bunch of them posting here daily.
Go figure.
Chernobyl Dead
The Chernobyl Dead, by now number in the thousands; perhaps tens of thousands.
The USSR 'induced' hundreds of thousands of Liquidators into CLOSE proximity to the exploded reactor. The Liquidators died from every imaginable radiation induced malady; and the dying will continue for centuries.
The USSR lied about radiation deaths until their dissolution. The USA lied and continues to lie about radiation deaths. Japan is lying about radiation deaths right now; as are you.
Radiation lies.
Only a hundred or so...
The number of people involved in the Chernobyl cleanup was kept to a minimum; only a hundred or so.
The stories about thousands, or tens of thousands or millions of casualties is merely the propaganda from the anti-nukes.
When the anti-nukes are confronted with the actual totals; they make the unsubstantiated claims that everyone else is lying.
A boldface LIAR such as yourself should not call others like myself liars. We have the data to back-up our claims.
For all those that claim Fukushima is so terrible and that the Japanese are lying; we have a refutation of that in sworn testimony to the US Congress by the President of the Health Physics Society, Dr. John Boice:
http://www.hps.org/documents/John_Boice_Testimony_13_May_2011.pdf
The health consequences for Japanese workers and public appear to be minor.
The health consequences for United States citizens is negligible to nonexistent.
The anti-nukes won't give any type of substantiation from the heads of scientific societies. If they provide any documentation at all, it will be from their own anti-nuke propaganda sites.
Chernobyl death and
Chernobyl death and disease
Your statements on Chernobyl are demonstrably false.
The World Health Organization Chernobyl has overview documentation on Chernobyl for deaths and adverse health effects at:
http://www.who.int/ionizing_radiation/chernobyl/backgrounder/en/index.html
Quotes:
"Thyroid cancer
A large increase in the incidence of thyroid cancer has occurred among people who were young children and adolescents at the time of the accident and lived in the most contaminated areas of Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine. This was due to the high levels of radioactive iodine released from the Chernobyl reactor in the early days after the accident."
"In Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine nearly 5 000 cases of thyroid cancer have now been diagnosed to date among children who were aged up to 18 years at the time of the accident."
"About 240 000 liquidators received the highest radiation doses while conducting major mitigation activities within the 30 km zone around the reactor. Later, the number of registered liquidators rose to 600 000"
"According to UNSCEAR (2000), 134 liquidators received radiation doses high enough to be diagnosed with acute radiation sickness (ARS). Among them, 28 persons died in 1986 due to ARS."
"The Expert Group concluded that there may be up to 4 000 additional cancer deaths among the three highest exposed groups over their lifetime (240 000 liquidators; 116 000 evacuees and the 270 000 residents of the SCZs)."
"Projections concerning cancer deaths among the five million residents of areas with radioactive caesium deposition of 37 kBq/m2 in Belarus, the Russian Federation and Ukraine are much less certain because they are exposed to doses slightly above natural background radiation levels. Predictions, generally based on the LNT model, suggest that up to 5 000 additional cancer deaths may occur in this population from radiation exposure"
"A large Russian study among emergency workers has suggested an increased risk of death from cardiovascular disease in highly exposed individuals. While this finding needs further study with longer follow-up times, it is consistent with other studies, for example, on radiotherapy patients, who received considerably higher doses to the heart."
"The Chernobyl accident led to extensive relocation of people, loss of economic stability, and long-term threats to health in current and possibly future generations."
The WHO estimate of deaths caused by Chernobyl does not include cancer deaths caused by the widespread radioactive fallout that occurred over many other parts of Europe.
The WHO estimate is therefore that more than 9,000 deaths have been caused by Chernobyl so far.
Did I call you a Liar
Please Excuse Me, that was not my intent. I meant to call you a gawdamn, pathological, dangerous liar.
According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, there were 700,000 Chernobyl Liquidators.
Here is a preliminary IAEA Staff Report, dated prior to the release of the recent, detailed cancer/leukemia studies.
http://www.iaea.org/newscenter/features/chernobyl-15/liquidators.shtml
Chernobyl's 700,000 "Liquidators" struggle with psychological and social consequences
Staff Report August 2005
Some 350,000 people involved in the initial clean-up of the plant in 1986-87 received average total body radiation doses of the order of 100 millisieverts (mSv) - a millisievert is a unit of radiation dose equivalent to about 10 general chest x-rays. This dose is about five times the maximum annual dose limit currently permitted for workers in nuclear facilities (20 mSv per year)
Likvidator
Accumulated doses were artificially lowered in the paperwork.
http://www.chernobylee.com/articles/chernobyl/interview-with-a-chernobyl...
During the summer of 1986, Sergei B. was a 30 year-old army reservist who volunteered to go to Chernobyl in late July as a participant in cleanup operations. Sergei worked as a liquidator at the Chernobyl Plant through early September, visiting the facility 23 times. He worked on "special projects" at the plant and made six trips to the roof of Reactor 3, where liquidators worked quickly to remove highly-contaminated rubble from the accident.
2. Why did you volunteer to go to Chernobyl?
I felt that I possessed the necessary knowledge and skills to do the work required - I had my secondary (military) education as an officer-chemist. At that time, in 1986, Ph.D. scientists had "carte blanche" - they had a power to decline the draft call (army reserve); around may-june of 1986 there was a massive call-on for mid-rank officer staff because of the high personnel rotation in early "liquidation" campaign, and Ph.D. scientists were sort of "untouchables". But I volunteered anyway.
6. You were in the Zone for just over one month - was the short time frame due to your accumulated radiation exposure, or was it planned to be that length when you first arrived?
Yes, it was because I had accumulated the sacred number - 25 Roentgens. In reality my dose was at least trice higher (according to my estimates) - during my time in the Zone, we did not have individual dosimeters whatsoever, the dose was calculated based on the "average" working irradiation measurements, 6-8 check-points on the perimeter/mid-section of the operational field, surface, etc. Based on the "level", the squad leader such as myself determined the average time of work, considering daily dose of 2.5 Roentgens (not higher) per person.
10. I have read that the Soviet government kept liquidators in the Zone beyond what was considered safe limitations of radiation exposure. Do you feel that happened in your case, and if so, why?
Yes, it happened in my case and in many other cases - countless, actually... - for several reasons. One was that there was not enough of individual dosimeters available during spring-summer of 1986 for everybody; only "civics", engineers and scientists, had them. We. "military", army reservists, did not. Shortage was a common word. Another reason was that it was not enough subs/rotation available, particularly of mid-rank officers, so doses accumulated by many of us during July-August-September of 1986 were artificially lowered in the paperwork.
Stupid LIES
It is VERY STUPID, to lie about factual information, already documented in this thread. Here is a health blog reference in the SF local newspaper, you dimwit loser.
"researchers at UCSF and the National Cancer Institute tracked 110,645 workers who helped in the cleanup"
http://www.sfgate.com/health/article/Genital-injuries-send-thousands-to-...
LEUKEMIA
Cancer tied to Chernobyl cleanup
Workers who cleaned up after the 1986 Chernobyl nuclear-power plant explosion share a significantly increased risk of developing leukemia, according to a new UCSF study. Researchers said the study is the largest and longest to date involving cleanup workers in the aftermath of the worst nuclear accident of the 20th century.
From 1986 to 2006, researchers at UCSF and the National Cancer Institute tracked 110,645 workers who helped in the cleanup. But the scientists did not expect to find an elevated risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, which many experts previously did not consider to be associated with radiation exposure.
- Stephanie M. Lee
No positive hormetic effects
There are NO beneficial exposures to ionizing radiation.
Abstract Excerpts
"inconsistent with a general role of hormetic positive effects of radiation on living organisms"
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1469-185X.2012.00249.x/abst...
The effects of natural variation in background radioactivity on humans, animals and other organisms
Anders P. Møller1,*, Timothy A. Mousseau2
Article first published online: 8 NOV 2012
© 2012The Authors. Biological Reviews © 2012 Cambridge Philosophical Society
A total of 46 studies with 373 effect size estimates revealed a small, but highly significant ...
Second, different mean effect sizes on broad categories
Third, these negative effects of radiation on mutations, immunology and life history are inconsistent with a general role of hormetic positive effects of radiation on living organisms.
Low-level radioactivity is damaging
University of South Carolina-study- Even low-level radioactivity is damaging
http://www.sc.edu/news/newsarticle.php?nid=5214#.UK0uo5G9KK3
Even low-level radioactivity is damaging
Broad analysis of many radiation studies finds no exposure threshold that precludes harm to life
http://www.sc.edu/news/newsarticle.php?nid=5214#.UK0uo5G9KK3
BRAWM Link:
http://www.nuc.berkeley.edu/forum/218/university-south-carolina-study-ev...
Harmful to life
We need to rethink ALL intentional exposures
http://www.sc.edu/news/newsarticle.php?nid=5214#.UK0uo5G9KK3
“There’s an attempt in the industry to downplay the doses that the populations are getting, because maybe it’s only one or two times beyond what is thought to be the natural background level,” he said. “But they’re assuming the natural background levels are fine.”
“We have to be thinking differently about how we develop regulations for exposures, and especially intentional exposures to populations, like the emissions from nuclear power plants, medical procedures, and even some x-ray machines at airports.”
1
Uno
CBC/Radio-Canada, makes precisely one (1) media outlet, in the Western World, which has covered this comprehensive, international, scientific study. Uno, by my count … rather- curious.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/story/2012/11/08/chornobyl-radiation-l...
Chornobyl workers' leukemia risks estimated
Study aims to fill gap in extrapolating radiation risks
CBC News Posted: Nov 8, 2012 4:19 PM ET Last Updated: Nov 8, 2012 4:16 PM ET
People who helped clean up after the 1986 Chornobyl nuclear plant accident show a higher risk for developing leukemia, say researchers who hope the findings will help better define the cancer risk of low doses of radiation.
Researchers in the U.S, Ukraine and Russia followed more than 110,000 workers
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia was the most common type of leukemia among the workers and cases are expected to increase as they age, the researchers said.
Chronic lymphocytic leukemia accounts for about three per cent of all cases of leukemia in Japan compared with one-third of all leukemia cases in the U.S. and 40 per cent in Ukraine, the researchers said.
CBC/Radio-Canada
BBC
The BBC picked up the story, in a somewhat cowardly fashion, IMHO.
http://www.newsbcc.com/canada/health/chornobyl_workers_leukemia_risks_es...
http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2012/11/08/chornobyl-radiation-leuke...
Health
Chornobyl workers' leukemia risks estimated
Study aims to fill gap in extrapolating radiation risks
CBC News Posted: Nov 8, 2012 4:19 PM ET Last Updated: Nov 8, 2012 4:16 PM ET
Yahoo News = 2
Picked Up by Yahoo, from CBC
http://ca.news.yahoo.com/chornobyl-workers-leukemia-risks-estimated-2016...
Treating CLL as a radiogenic cancer
ALL other cancers are considered radiogenic
http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-03-21/html/2011-6329.htm
http://www.dol.gov/owcp/energy/regs/compliance/PolicyandProcedures/final...
SUMMARY: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is proposing to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) as a radiogenic cancer under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA). Under current guidelines HHS promulgated as regulations in 2002, all types of cancers except for CLL are treated as being potentially caused by radiation and hence as potentially compensable under EEOICPA. HHS proposes to reverse its decision to exclude CLL from such treatment.
CLL is radiogenic
HHS prepares to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) as a radiogenic cancer
http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eAgendaViewRule?pubId=201110&RIN=0920-AA39
Abstract: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) will treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) as a radiogenic cancer under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA). CLL has been considered to be caused by radiation and hence not potentially compensable under EEOICPA. HHS reverses its decision to exclude CLL from such treatment.
Agency: Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)
CLL is Radiogenic … ruling effective March 7, 2012
CLL is now treated as Radiogenic
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/ocas/ocasirep.html
Notice of Revision of Guidelines on Non-Radiogenic Cancers
In a notice of proposed rulemaking published in the Federal Register on March 21, 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) proposed to treat chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) as a radiogenic cancer under the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (EEOICPA) (76 FR 15268). On February 6, 2012, the final rule was published. Under the final rule, CLL will now be treated as being potentially caused by radiation and as potentially compensable under EEOICPA. This reverses the earlier decision by HHS to exclude this cancer from consideration. This change will become effective on March 7, 2012.
Chernobyl CLL rates will rapidly increase.
CLL radiogenic risk has important public health implications for the USA.
http://www.amstat.org/meetings/radiation/2012/AbstractDetails.cfm?Abstra...
Radiation-related risks of leukemia among Chornobyl cleanup workers from Ukraine
American Statistical Association Presentation *Lydia B. Zablotska, UCSF
The effects of ionizing radiation on leukemia have been clearly demonstrated by studies of individuals exposed to high doses of radiation, generally at high dose-rates, such as the study of the survivors of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and radiation treatment studies.
In the largest to date pooled analysis, nuclear workers were monitored for external radiation on a monthly or yearly level providing a rough estimate of the “dose-rate” effect. Overall, estimates were compatible with the estimates from the high-dose studies and confirmed that extrapolations from the high-dose studies did not underestimate radiation-related risks from low-dose exposure.
Cases were confirmed by the international panel of hematopathologists based on the description of the clinical courses and histological confirmation of the diagnosis from the medical records (available for all cases) and bone marrow aspirates/ biopsy slides and/or peripheral blood smears (available for 70% of cases). Acute leukemia types were classified using the WHO system of classification. CLL diagnoses were based on the criteria established by the NCI Working group.
The estimated risk of non-CLL was lower but compatible with the risk in the A-bomb study, providing some evidence of the sparing of late effects of radiation administered at a low dose-rate in comparison with the effects of almost instantaneous exposures. Further, our results indicate that risk estimates are similar for CLL and non-CLL. Increased risks of CLL were reported in the studies of Chornobyl cleanup workers from Belarus, the Russian Federation and Baltic countries and from uranium miners with exposures to alpha particles and gamma radiation in Czechoslovakia, Germany, and Canada.
CLL is the most common type of leukemia in this cleanup worker population and, as they age, will rapidly increase in rates, raising concern for medical consequences. The radiogenic risk for CLL also has important public health implications in other populations as it is the most prevalent type of leukemia in Western populations, with approximately 20,000 cases estimated to be diagnosed in the U.S. in 2011.
CLL cases 60% higher than expected
CLL cases diagnosed over 20 years was 60% higher than expected for the general male population of Ukraine
Radiation and the Risk of Chronic Lymphocytic and Other Leukemias among Chornobyl Cleanup Workers
Background: Risks of most types of leukemia from exposure to acute high doses of ionizing radiation are well known, but risks associated with protracted exposures, and associations between radiation and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) are not clear.
Objectives: To estimate relative risks of CLL and non-CLL from protracted exposures to lowdose ionizing radiation.
Conclusions: Exposure to low doses and low dose-rates of radiation from post-Chornobyl cleanup work was associated with a significant increase in risk of leukemia, which was statistically consistent with estimates for the Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Based on the primary analysis, we conclude that CLL and non-CLL are both radiosensitive.
In our previous study of leukemia occurring between 1986 and 2000 among Chornobyl cleanup workers from Ukraine (Romanenko et al. 2008b), we found a significantly increased risk of leukemia, which was similar in magnitude to the estimate from the Japanese atomic bomb survivors (UNSCEAR 2008). The data indicated elevated risks for both CLL and other leukemias. We therefore extended the study through 2006, with a near doubling of the number of leukemia cases. We herein report results of the analysis of the extended data.
Using the age-specific incidence rate of CLL among men in Ukraine for 2003, we estimated that the number of CLL cases diagnosed in our cohort of 110,645 male cleanup workers over the period of 20 years after the accident was 60% higher than what would be expected for the general male population of Ukraine (standardized incidence ratio=1.60 (95% CI: 1.3, 2.0)
Ionizing Radiation & Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia
“CLL occurring among the clean-up workers was of a more aggressive form than is normally seen in the community.”
http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docket/archive/pdfs/NIOSH-209/0209-010108-hambl...
Science Direct
Have we been wrong about ionizing radiation and chronic lymphocytic leukemia?
Abstract
It is almost axiomatic that chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is not caused by ionizing radiation. This assumption has been challenged recently by a critical re-appraisal of existing data. A recent paper implicated radon exposure in Czech uranium mine workers as a possible cause of CLL and in this issue of Leukemia Research the first paper examining the incidence of CLL among those exposed to radiation from the accident at the nuclear power plant in Chernobyl is published. It suggests that CLL occurring among the clean-up workers was of a more aggressive form than is normally seen in the community.
Hematological Diseases Among Liquidators
National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health
The Chernobyl accident - 25 Years of study - Leukemia and Thyroid Cancer Research
http://chernobyl.cancer.gov/leukemia_ukraine.html
Study of Leukemia and Other Hematological Diseases Among Liquidators in Ukraine After the Chernobyl Accident
BACKGROUND
Several years after a 1988 agreement between the United States and the USSR to cooperate in the area of nuclear reactor safety, the National Cancer Institute (NCI), NIH undertook to develop a study of leukemia risk among Ukrainian men potentially exposed to external radiation during clean-up operations (e.g., liquidators) following the Chernobyl accident. Responsibility for the study resides in the Radiation Epidemiology Branch of NCI.
ROLES OF UNITED STATES PARTICIPANTS
•The NCI staff is charged with scientific direction and management of the projects.
•The external advisory group (LAG) is comprised of recognized experts in the relevant scientific fields. They review the activities of the collaborative studies approximately once a year and report to the Director of the Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, NCI. Their comments and recommendations are also shared with the collaborating investigators.
“This new study provided stronger evidence”
“Radiation has been long known to increase the risk of various types of leukemia.”
Earlier studies of Chernobyl cleanup workers suggested there might be an increased risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia associated with radiation exposure, and this new study provided stronger evidence to support this association.
http://www.laboratoryequipment.com/news/2012/11/chernobyl-cleanup-worker...
Chernobyl Cleanup Workers Have Increased Risk for Leukemia
A new study found a significantly elevated risk for chronic lymphocytic leukemia among workers who were engaged in recovery and clean-up activities following the Chernobyl power plant accident in 1986. Radiation has been long known to increase the risk of various types of leukemia.
Earlier studies of Chernobyl cleanup workers suggested there might be an increased risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (a less aggressive form of leukemia) associated with radiation exposure, and this new study provided stronger evidence to support this association.
NCI News Note
Increased risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Chernobyl cleanup workers
http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/newsfromnci/2012/LeukemiaChornobylWorkers
This international study was conducted by NCI, Columbia University, New York, and the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) and appeared online November 8, 2012, in Environmental Health Perspectives.
A new study found a significantly elevated risk for chronic lymphocytic leukemia among workers who were engaged in recovery and clean-up activities following the Chernobyl power plant accident in 1986. Radiation has been long known to increase the risk of various types of leukemia. Earlier studies of Chernobyl cleanup workers suggested there might be an increased risk of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (a less aggressive form of leukemia) associated with radiation exposure, and this new study provided stronger evidence to support this association.
Low doses of radiation are important
“The findings shed light on the thorny issue of estimating cancer risk from low doses of radiation”
“The risk included a greater-than-expected number of cases of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, which many experts did not consider to be associated with radiation exposure in the past.”
http://www.ucsf.edu/news/2012/11/13087/chernobyl-cleanup-workers-had-sig...
In the journal Environmental Health Perspectives this week, an international team led by scientists at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) and the Chernobyl Research Unit at the Radiation Epidemiology Branch of the National Cancer Institute describes the increased risks of leukemia among these workers between 1986 and 2006. The risk included a greater-than-expected number of cases of chronic lymphocytic leukemia, which many experts did not consider to be associated with radiation exposure in the past.
The new work is the largest and longest study to date involving Chernobyl cleanup workers who worked at or near the nuclear complex in the aftermath of the accident.
The findings shed light on the thorny issue of estimating cancer risk from low doses of radiation — an issue of importance to miners, nuclear workers and anyone who is chronically exposed to low levels of radiation at work or patients who receive sizeable radiation doses when undergoing medical diagnostic tests.
“Low doses of radiation are important,” said the lead researcher Lydia Zablotska, MD, PhD, an associate professor of epidemiology and biostatistics at UCSF. “We want to raise awareness of that.”
Low-level radiation can cause leukemia
Exposure to low-level radiation can cause leukemia, U.S.-Ukraine study of Chernobyl cleanup workers finds
Friday, Nov. 9, 2012 http://www.japantimes.co.jp/text/nn20121109a5.html
WASHINGTON — Protracted exposure to low-level radiation is associated with a significant increase in the risk of leukemia, according to a long-term study published Thursday in a U.S. research journal. The study released in the monthly Environmental Health Perspectives was based on a 20-year survey of around 110,000 workers who engaged in cleanup work related to the Chernobyl nuclear plant disaster in 1986.
Scientists from the University of California, San Francisco, the U.S. National Cancer Institute and the National Research Center for Radiation Medicine in Ukraine were among those who participated in the research. The scientists conducted a followup health survey covering 110,645 cleanup workers through 2006. Of those surveyed, 87 percent had been exposed to cumulative radiation doses of below 200 millisieverts and 78 percent to below 100 millisieverts, indicating the impact on health of low-level exposure is not negligible.
The finding was statistically consistent with estimates for Japanese atomic bomb survivors, the research team said. Keigo Endo, a radiologist and president of Kyoto College of Medical Science, pointed to previous data showing an increased risk of leukemia with cumulative radiation exposure of as low as 120 millisieverts.
Use-By-Date
CLL IS RADIOGENIC.
CLL IS RADIOGENIC. That conclusion is inescapable, at this point. Much of the earlier data was inconclusive, but NOW, the question is definitively answered. The following paper experienced an extremely short shelf life. The ‘Use-By-Date’ should be stamped as … YESTERDAY! OOPS!
http://www.springerlink.com/content/3l3h322452k3l532/
“Leukemia incidence in the Russian cohort of Chernobyl emergency workers”
V. K. Ivanov, A. F. Tsyb, S. E. Khait, V. V. Kashcheev, S. Yu. Chekin, M. A. Maksioutov and K. A. Tumanov
Physics and Astronomy Radiation and Environmental Biophysics
Volume 51, Number 2 (2012), 143-149, DOI: 10.1007/s00411-011-0400-y
Use-By-Date II
Needs an UPDATE
http://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancercauses/othercarcinogens/medicaltreatm...
American Cancer Society - Radiation Exposure and Cancer
Types of cancer linked to ionizing radiation
Ionizing radiation increases the risk of certain types of cancer more than others.
The thyroid gland and bone marrow are particularly sensitive to radiation. Leukemia, a type of cancer that arises in the bone marrow, is the most common radiation-induced cancer. Leukemias may appear as early as a few years after radiation exposure.
If cancer does develop after radiation therapy, it does not happen right away. For leukemias, most cases develop within 5 to 9 years after exposure. In contrast, other cancers often take much longer to develop. Most of these cancers are not seen for 10 years after radiation therapy, and some are diagnosed even more than 15 years later.
© 2012 American Cancer Society, Inc. Call us any time: (800) 227-2345