Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2011-08-08 10:50.
:(
More to the point of this webpage.
The federal government does not have a strategic stockpile of counter-radiation drugs. The Obama Gang sold the life-saving drugs for 'walking arround money'.
A hydrogen detonation at Fukushima Unit-3 resulted in a nuclear explosion of MOX fuel. Common construction materials have induced radioactivity levels that deliver a fatal dose within a couple of seconds. Meanwhile the NRC is licensing aging USA nuclear reactors to use MOX fuel.
Federal government test results of highly radioactive Pacific seafood are not being disclosed to the American public.
The hydrogen explosion can't trigger a nuclear explosion in MOX because MOX is only 7% Plutonium and that is BELOW the minimum percentage to have a nuclear explosion. Additionally, as the originator of the implosion concept Seth Neddermeyer at Los Alamos found out; a non-focused explosion won't give you a nuclear explosion. One has to have explosive lenses made of 2 different explosives with differing detonation velocities in order to focus the implosion. Gunderson doesn't know beans about nuclear explosions.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2011-06-07 00:06.
LOL. Surviving nuclear fallout is rather in vain if your money goes to zero in the process. Just a heads up from one brother to another.
For those of you who did not watch yesterday’s monetary policy hearing in the house of representatives, you most likely missed this bombshell exchange between Federal Reserve lawyer Scott Alvarez and committee chairman Dr. Ron Paul. My jaw literally dropped when I heard the Fed’s general counsel declare that the Federal Reserve owns no gold.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2011-06-07 07:38.
After 1934, Alvarez explains that the Fed handed its gold over to the Treasury in exchange for gold certificates. When pressed further, Alvarez noted that the gold certificates do not represent any interest whatsoever in the gold itself. He explained the gold certificate listings on the Fed balance sheet, not as a claim to gold, but at most a claim to dollars from the Treasury.
p. 135: George Bernard Shaw in 1928 was quoted as saying: "If you have to choose between trusting the natural stability of gold, and the honesty and intelligence of members of the government, with due respect for these gentlemen, I advise you, as long as the capitalist system lasts, to vote for gold."
AND I advise you, if you want the truth, just follow the gold.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2011-06-07 08:52.
Alan Greenspan put it succinctly:
In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists’ antagonism toward the gold standard.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Tue, 2011-06-07 09:27.
This deification of gold is kind of absurd. Gold is useless in the absence of an arbitrary rule to provide it with exchange value.
Anyway, you do realize that posting all this gold fetish articles on a completely unrelated forum invalidates your message? The fact that you post them here just becomes an indication of how out of touch you are. Which only suggests the idea that people getting worked up about the federal reserve not having any gold since 80 years ago are social freaks.
Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Mon, 2011-08-08 08:45.
Too bad you didn't listen to the guy. Now you're probably too timid to buy any at $1700/oz and the next thing you know it's $10,000 and you're shivering in the dark.
:( More to the point of this
:(
More to the point of this webpage.
The federal government does not have a strategic stockpile of counter-radiation drugs. The Obama Gang sold the life-saving drugs for 'walking arround money'.
A hydrogen detonation at Fukushima Unit-3 resulted in a nuclear explosion of MOX fuel. Common construction materials have induced radioactivity levels that deliver a fatal dose within a couple of seconds. Meanwhile the NRC is licensing aging USA nuclear reactors to use MOX fuel.
Federal government test results of highly radioactive Pacific seafood are not being disclosed to the American public.
Reading too much Gunderson
The hydrogen explosion can't trigger a nuclear explosion in MOX because MOX is only 7% Plutonium and that is BELOW the minimum percentage to have a nuclear explosion. Additionally, as the originator of the implosion concept Seth Neddermeyer at Los Alamos found out; a non-focused explosion won't give you a nuclear explosion. One has to have explosive lenses made of 2 different explosives with differing detonation velocities in order to focus the implosion. Gunderson doesn't know beans about nuclear explosions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Explosive_lens
Maybe Tepco threw this on
Maybe Tepco threw this on the BRAWM forum to get us all side tracked--
LOL. Surviving nuclear
LOL. Surviving nuclear fallout is rather in vain if your money goes to zero in the process. Just a heads up from one brother to another.
For those of you who did not watch yesterday’s monetary policy hearing in the house of representatives, you most likely missed this bombshell exchange between Federal Reserve lawyer Scott Alvarez and committee chairman Dr. Ron Paul. My jaw literally dropped when I heard the Fed’s general counsel declare that the Federal Reserve owns no gold.
Former Minnesota Governor
Former Minnesota Governor and Republican presidential aspirant Tim Pawlenty on Tuesday set out his goal for 5%-a-year economic growth.
Oh geez. Just what the planet needs!
Disagree. All I want is a
Disagree.
All I want is a simple life. I don't mind working bloody hard to make ends meet.
I do mind the excruciating pain of cancer, and sick children.
And it seems it doesn't own
And it seems it doesn't own it since 1934.
After 1934, Alvarez explains
After 1934, Alvarez explains that the Fed handed its gold over to the Treasury in exchange for gold certificates. When pressed further, Alvarez noted that the gold certificates do not represent any interest whatsoever in the gold itself. He explained the gold certificate listings on the Fed balance sheet, not as a claim to gold, but at most a claim to dollars from the Treasury.
Why is gold so important,
Why is gold so important, are we back in the middle ages already?
World to Mr. Anonymous
You tell us why gold is so important.
Got yours?
https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/mra
https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/mragheb/www/NPRE%20402%20ME%20405%20Nuclear%20...
p. 135: George Bernard Shaw in 1928 was quoted as saying: "If you have to choose between trusting the natural stability of gold, and the honesty and intelligence of members of the government, with due respect for these gentlemen, I advise you, as long as the capitalist system lasts, to vote for gold."
AND I advise you, if you want the truth, just follow the gold.
Alan Greenspan put it
Alan Greenspan put it succinctly:
In the absence of the gold standard, there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflation. This is the shabby secret of the welfare statists’ tirades against gold. Deficit spending is simply a scheme for the confiscation of wealth. Gold stands in the way of this insidious process. It stands as a protector of property rights. If one grasps this, one has no difficulty in understanding the statists’ antagonism toward the gold standard.
This deification of gold is
This deification of gold is kind of absurd. Gold is useless in the absence of an arbitrary rule to provide it with exchange value.
Anyway, you do realize that posting all this gold fetish articles on a completely unrelated forum invalidates your message? The fact that you post them here just becomes an indication of how out of touch you are. Which only suggests the idea that people getting worked up about the federal reserve not having any gold since 80 years ago are social freaks.
Too bad you didn't listen to
Too bad you didn't listen to the guy. Now you're probably too timid to buy any at $1700/oz and the next thing you know it's $10,000 and you're shivering in the dark.
Fools never listen.
How is this related to
How is this related to Berkeley Radiological Air and Water Monitoring?
More of the same trickery
More of the same trickery against the people and the planet. It's all related.